The demographic transition in Sweden in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: The demographic transition in Sweden was 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 4.2%
World rank
21st
of 56 countries
All-time high
49.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1952
All-time low
10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1955
Years of data
109
1900–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Costa Rica, 1900–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
The most recent figure for the demographic transition in sweden in Costa Rica is 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population), measured in 2010.
That represents a change of down 4.2% on the previous year and down 30.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Costa Rica peaked at 49.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1952 and was at its lowest, 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1955.
That places Costa Rica 21st out of 56 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 109 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1900 | 41.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1901 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.6% |
| 1902 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1903 | 36.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1904 | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.8% |
| 1905 | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1906 | 39.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 1907 | 42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.9% |
| 1908 | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1909 | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 41.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1911 | 43.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1912 | 42.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1913 | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1914 | 44.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1915 | 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1916 | 41.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1917 | 41.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1918 | 40 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1919 | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.5% |
| 1920 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.4% |
| 1921 | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1922 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1923 | 38.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1924 | 38.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1925 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1926 | 46.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +22.5% |
| 1927 | 47.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1928 | 48.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1929 | 46.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1930 | 47.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1931 | 46.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1932 | 45.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1933 | 44.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1934 | 44.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1935 | 45.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1936 | 45.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 44.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1938 | 45.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1939 | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1940 | 45.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1941 | 45.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1942 | 43.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1943 | 46.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.5% |
| 1944 | 44.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1945 | 46.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.9% |
| 1946 | 45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1947 | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1948 | 44.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1949 | 44.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1950 | 46.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.2% |
| 1951 | 48.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 1952 | 49.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1953 | 47.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1954 | 49.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1955 | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -78.3% |
| 1956 | 48.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +353.3% |
| 1957 | 47.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1958 | 47.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1959 | 48.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1960 | 47.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1961 | 46.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1962 | 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1963 | 45.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1964 | 43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1965 | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1966 | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1967 | 39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1968 | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.2% |
| 1969 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1970 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1971 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1972 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1973 | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.7% |
| 1974 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1975 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1977 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 1978 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1979 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1980 | 29.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1981 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1982 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1983 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1984 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1985 | 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.0% |
| 1987 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.7% |
| 1988 | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1989 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1990 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1991 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1992 | 27.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1994 | 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.9% |
| 1995 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1996 | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1997 | 22.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1998 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1999 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 22.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 2001 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.5% |
| 2002 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.2% |
| 2003 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 2005 | 16.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 2006 | 16.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 2007 | 16.46 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 2008 | 16.59 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 2009 | 16.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 2010 | 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.3× the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 85% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Costa Rica changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1956 | +353.3% | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 48.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1955 | -78.3% | 49.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 39.18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 41.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 44.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 41.96 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 48.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 45.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 44.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 47.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 46.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 44.47 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 49.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 42.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 47.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 30.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 30.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1990s | 25.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 2000s | 17.74 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 18 Guadeloupe 17.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 19 Ireland 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 20 Jamaica 16.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 22 Chile 14.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 23 New Zealand 14.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 24 Uruguay 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Costa Rica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2987 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.406 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0907 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Costa Rica?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Costa Rica was 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 49.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1952.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1955.
- How does Costa Rica rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Costa Rica ranks 21st out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is down 30.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 109 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.