New Zealand vs Uruguay: The demographic transition in Sweden
New Zealand
14.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2009
Uruguay
14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2009
New Zealand rank
23rd
Uruguay rank
24th
The demographic transition in Sweden over time
- New Zealand
- Uruguay
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 14.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) against 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in Uruguay, a difference of 0.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population).
The two have swapped places 7 times across 128 shared years of data; in 1882 it was Uruguay ahead.
New Zealand ranks 23rd and Uruguay ranks 24th of 56 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 10.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 33.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 4.82 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Uruguay |
| 1890s | 27.09 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Uruguay |
| 1900s | 26.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 4.51 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Uruguay |
| 1910s | 25.25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 4.15 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Uruguay |
| 1920s | 21.79 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 3.64 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Uruguay |
| 1930s | 18.58 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 2.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Uruguay |
| 1940s | 24.63 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 4.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | New Zealand |
| 1950s | 26.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.78 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 5.24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | New Zealand |
| 1960s | 24.27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.92 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1.35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 19.32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.09 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 0.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 16.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Uruguay |
| 1990s | 16.26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1.27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 14.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 0.5185 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher the demographic transition in sweden, New Zealand or Uruguay?
- New Zealand, at 14.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) against 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in Uruguay as of 2009.
- What is the difference in the demographic transition in sweden between New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 0.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population), with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?
- 128 years are reported by both, from 1882 to 2009.
- How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for the demographic transition in sweden?
- New Zealand ranks 23rd and Uruguay ranks 24th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.