The demographic transition in Sweden in Tunisia
Tunisia: The demographic transition in Sweden was 17.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2008. ▼ Falling
Latest (2008)
17.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 2.1%
World rank
16th
of 56 countries
All-time high
45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1964
All-time low
16.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2004
Years of data
49
1956–2008
The demographic transition in Sweden in Tunisia, 1956–2008
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
In 2008, the demographic transition in sweden in Tunisia stood at 17.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population).
That represents a change of up 2.1% on the previous year and down 6.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Tunisia peaked at 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1964 and was at its lowest, 16.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2004.
Tunisia ranks 16th of 56 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 49 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1956 | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1957 | 39.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.7% |
| 1958 | 44.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +13.5% |
| 1959 | 44.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1960 | 43.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1961 | 42.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1962 | 41.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1963 | 42.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1964 | 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.8% |
| 1965 | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.9% |
| 1966 | 43.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.8% |
| 1967 | 38.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.2% |
| 1968 | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1969 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1970 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 1971 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1972 | 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.3% |
| 1973 | 36.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1974 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1975 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1976 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1977 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1978 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.1% |
| 1979 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1980 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1981 | 34.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1982 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1983 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1984 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1985 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1986 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1987 | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1988 | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.8% |
| 1989 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.7% |
| 1990 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1991 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1992 | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1993 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1994 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.8% |
| 1995 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.4% |
| 1996 | 19.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1997 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1999 | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.6% |
| 2001 | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 16.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2005 | 17.05 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 2006 | 17.12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 2007 | 17.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 2008 | 17.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 17.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 78% of the median. (5 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 41.05 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 44.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 4 |
| 1960s | 41.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 31.05 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 22.11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 2000s | 17.15 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 13 Philippines 19.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 14 Argentina 18.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 15 El Salvador 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 17 Sri Lanka 17.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 18 Guadeloupe 17.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 19 Ireland 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Tunisia?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Tunisia was 17.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2008, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1964.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 16.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2004.
- How does Tunisia rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Tunisia ranks 16th out of 56 countries with data for 2008.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 49 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.