The demographic transition in Sweden in Philippines
Philippines: The demographic transition in Sweden was 19.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2007. ▼ Falling
Latest (2007)
19.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 3.2%
World rank
13th
of 56 countries
All-time high
37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1903
All-time low
19.12 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2006
Years of data
92
1903–2007
The demographic transition in Sweden in Philippines, 1903–2007
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Philippines recorded 19.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2007.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.2% on the previous year and down 30.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Philippines peaked at 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1903 and was at its lowest, 19.12 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2006.
Philippines ranks 13th of 56 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 92 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Philippines, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1903 | 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1904 | 27.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -25.5% |
| 1905 | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.2% |
| 1906 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.9% |
| 1907 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +19.4% |
| 1908 | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.1% |
| 1909 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.1% |
| 1910 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.1% |
| 1911 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1912 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1913 | 34.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1914 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.8% |
| 1915 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.5% |
| 1916 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1917 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1918 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1919 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.8% |
| 1920 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.8% |
| 1921 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1922 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1923 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1926 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1927 | 35.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.1% |
| 1928 | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1929 | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.6% |
| 1931 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1933 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1934 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1935 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1936 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1937 | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1938 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1946 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.8% |
| 1947 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.5% |
| 1948 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1949 | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1950 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1951 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1952 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1953 | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1954 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1955 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1956 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1958 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1959 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1960 | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -22.0% |
| 1961 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1962 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +16.1% |
| 1963 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1964 | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1965 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1966 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1967 | 24.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1968 | 25.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 1969 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1970 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1971 | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1972 | 24.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1973 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.6% |
| 1974 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.2% |
| 1976 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.4% |
| 1977 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1979 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1980 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1981 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.2% |
| 1982 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1983 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1984 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1985 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1986 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1987 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1988 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1993 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1994 | 24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -21.1% |
| 1995 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1996 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1997 | 28.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +23.5% |
| 1998 | 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1999 | 21.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -23.1% |
| 2000 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.9% |
| 2001 | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 2002 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 2003 | 20.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 2004 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 2005 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 2006 | 19.12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 2007 | 19.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
Philippines compared with similar countries
- Philippines's 19.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.1× the median. (14 countries reporting)
- Philippines's 19.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 13.47 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.5× the median. (7 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7 |
| 1910s | 34.12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 34.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 8 |
| 1930s | 32.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1940s | 30.45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 4 |
| 1950s | 30.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 25.32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 27.92 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 32.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1990s | 25.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7 |
| 2000s | 20.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 8 |
Countries ranked near Philippines
- 10 Fiji 21.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 11 Venezuela 20.82 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 12 Panama 19.81 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 14 Argentina 18.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 15 El Salvador 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 16 Tunisia 17.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Philippines
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.43 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 12.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 7.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 10.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 15.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 67.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 7.76 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Philippines?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Philippines was 19.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2007, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Philippines?
- The highest recorded value was 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1903.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Philippines?
- The lowest recorded value was 19.12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2006.
- How does Philippines rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Philippines ranks 13th out of 56 countries with data for 2007.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Philippines?
- Over the last ten years it is down 30.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Philippines data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 92 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.