The demographic transition in Sweden in Argentina
Argentina: The demographic transition in Sweden was 18.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009. ▼ Falling
Latest (2009)
18.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 1.1%
World rank
14th
of 56 countries
All-time high
38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1912
All-time low
17.81 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2007
Years of data
100
1910–2009
The demographic transition in Sweden in Argentina, 1910–2009
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Argentina recorded 18.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2009.
That represents a change of down 1.1% on the previous year and down 1.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Argentina peaked at 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1912 and was at its lowest, 17.81 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2007.
Argentina ranks 14th of 56 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 100 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Argentina, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1910 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1911 | 37.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1912 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1913 | 38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1914 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1915 | 35.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1916 | 35.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1918 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1919 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1920 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1921 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1922 | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1923 | 34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1924 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1925 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1926 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1927 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1928 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1929 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1930 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1931 | 28.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1932 | 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1933 | 26.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.1% |
| 1934 | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1935 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1936 | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1937 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1938 | 24.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1939 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1940 | 24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1941 | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1942 | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1943 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.9% |
| 1944 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.1% |
| 1945 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1947 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1948 | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1949 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1950 | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1951 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1952 | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1953 | 25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1954 | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1955 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1956 | 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1957 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1958 | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1959 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1960 | 22.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1961 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1962 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1963 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1964 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1965 | 21.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1966 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1967 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1968 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1969 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +16.4% |
| 1970 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.5% |
| 1971 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1972 | 22.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1973 | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1974 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 1975 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1976 | 23.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1977 | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1978 | 24.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1979 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1980 | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1981 | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1982 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1983 | 22.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1984 | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1985 | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1986 | 22.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1987 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1988 | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1989 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1990 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1991 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1992 | 20.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1993 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1994 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1995 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1996 | 19.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1997 | 19.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1998 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1999 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 2000 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 2001 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 2002 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 2003 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 2004 | 19.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.9% |
| 2005 | 18.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 2006 | 17.87 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 2007 | 17.81 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 2008 | 18.77 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.4% |
| 2009 | 18.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
Argentina compared with similar countries
- Argentina's 18.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.0× the median. (14 countries reporting)
- Argentina's 18.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.0× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 35.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 31.97 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 25.99 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 24.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 24.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 22.45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 23.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 22.32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 19.69 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 18.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.81 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
- 11 Venezuela 20.82 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 12 Panama 19.81 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 13 Philippines 19.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 15 El Salvador 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 16 Tunisia 17.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 17 Sri Lanka 17.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Argentina
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 20.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 37.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 5.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 37.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 111.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 187.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 31.35 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Argentina?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Argentina was 18.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1912.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 17.81 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2007.
- How does Argentina rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Argentina ranks 14th out of 56 countries with data for 2009.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 100 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.