The demographic transition in Sweden in Ireland
Ireland: The demographic transition in Sweden was 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 0.8%
World rank
19th
of 56 countries
All-time high
28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1871
All-time low
13.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1995
Years of data
146
1864–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Ireland, 1864–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Ireland recorded 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2010.
The figure is down 0.8% on the previous year and up 15.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Ireland peaked at 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1871 and was at its lowest, 13.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1995.
That places Ireland 19th out of 56 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 146 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Ireland, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1864 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1865 | 25.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.0% |
| 1866 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1867 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1868 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1869 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 27.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1871 | 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1872 | 27.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1873 | 27.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1874 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1875 | 26.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1876 | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1877 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1878 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1879 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1880 | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1881 | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1882 | 24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1883 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1884 | 23.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1885 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1886 | 23.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1887 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1888 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1889 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1890 | 22.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1891 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1892 | 22.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1893 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1894 | 22.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1895 | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1896 | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1897 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1898 | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1899 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1900 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1901 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1903 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1904 | 23.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1905 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1906 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1907 | 23.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1908 | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1909 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1910 | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1911 | 23.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1912 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1913 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1914 | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1915 | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1916 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1917 | 19.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1918 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1919 | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1920 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +14.0% |
| 1922 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.5% |
| 1923 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.1% |
| 1924 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1925 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1926 | 20.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1927 | 20.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1928 | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1929 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1930 | 19.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1931 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1932 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1933 | 19.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1934 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1935 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1936 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 19.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1938 | 19.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1939 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1940 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 19 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1942 | 22.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.4% |
| 1943 | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1944 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1945 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1946 | 22.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1947 | 23.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1948 | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1949 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1950 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1951 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1952 | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1953 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1954 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1955 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1956 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1958 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1959 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1960 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1961 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1962 | 21.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1963 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1964 | 22.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1965 | 22.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1966 | 21.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1967 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1968 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1969 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1970 | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1971 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1972 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 22.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1974 | 22.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1975 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1976 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1977 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1978 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1979 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1980 | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1981 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1982 | 20.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1983 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1984 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1985 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1986 | 17.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1987 | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1988 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.8% |
| 1989 | 14.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1990 | 15.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1991 | 14.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1992 | 14.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1993 | 13.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1994 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1995 | 13.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1996 | 13.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1997 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1998 | 14.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1999 | 14.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 2000 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 2001 | 15.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.6% |
| 2002 | 15.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 2003 | 15.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 2004 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 2005 | 14.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 2006 | 15.17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 2007 | 16.28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.3% |
| 2008 | 16.98 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 2009 | 16.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 2010 | 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
Ireland compared with similar countries
- Ireland's 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.4× the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Ireland's 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.5× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 26.05 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 6 |
| 1870s | 26.63 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1880s | 23.59 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1890s | 23.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 23.19 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 21.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 20.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1930s | 19.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 21.68 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 21.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 21.63 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 21.78 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 18.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 14.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 15.56 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.98 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Ireland
- 16 Tunisia 17.72 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 17 Sri Lanka 17.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 18 Guadeloupe 17.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 20 Jamaica 16.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 21 Costa Rica 15.55 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 22 Chile 14.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Ireland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0921 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.6 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 21.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5015 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Ireland?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Ireland was 16.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Ireland?
- The highest recorded value was 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1871.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Ireland?
- The lowest recorded value was 13.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1995.
- How does Ireland rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Ireland ranks 19th out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Ireland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 15.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ireland data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 146 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.