The demographic transition in Sweden in Spain
Spain: The demographic transition in Sweden was 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 3.3%
World rank
46th
of 56 countries
All-time high
39.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1864
All-time low
9.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1996
Years of data
145
1858–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Spain, 1858–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
In 2010, the demographic transition in sweden in Spain stood at 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population).
The figure is down 3.3% on the previous year and up 5.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Spain peaked at 39.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1864 and was at its lowest, 9.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1996.
That places Spain 46th out of 56 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 145 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Spain, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1858 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1859 | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.1% |
| 1860 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1861 | 39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.3% |
| 1862 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1863 | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1864 | 39.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1865 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1866 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1867 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1868 | 35.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.3% |
| 1869 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1870 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1878 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1879 | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1880 | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1881 | 37.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1882 | 36.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1883 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1884 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1885 | 36.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1886 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1887 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1888 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1889 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1891 | 35.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1892 | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1893 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1894 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1895 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1896 | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1897 | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1898 | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1899 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1900 | 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1901 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1902 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1903 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1904 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.0% |
| 1905 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1906 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1907 | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1908 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1909 | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1910 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1911 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1912 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1913 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1914 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1915 | 30.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1916 | 29.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.8% |
| 1917 | 29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1918 | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1919 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1920 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.7% |
| 1921 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1922 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1925 | 29.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1926 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1927 | 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1928 | 29.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1929 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1930 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1932 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1933 | 27.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1934 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1935 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1936 | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1937 | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.5% |
| 1938 | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.5% |
| 1939 | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -17.5% |
| 1940 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +47.9% |
| 1941 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -19.7% |
| 1942 | 20.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1943 | 22.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +13.4% |
| 1944 | 22.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1945 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1946 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.4% |
| 1947 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.9% |
| 1949 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1950 | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.5% |
| 1951 | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1952 | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1953 | 20.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1954 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1955 | 20.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1956 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1957 | 21.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.4% |
| 1958 | 21.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1959 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1960 | 21.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1961 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1962 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1964 | 21.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1965 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1966 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1967 | 20.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1968 | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1969 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1970 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1971 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 19.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1973 | 19.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1974 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1975 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1976 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 18.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1978 | 17.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1979 | 16.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 1980 | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 1981 | 14.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.2% |
| 1982 | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1983 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1984 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1985 | 11.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1986 | 11.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1987 | 10.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1988 | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1990 | 10.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1991 | 10.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1992 | 10.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1993 | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1994 | 9.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1995 | 9.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1996 | 9.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1997 | 9.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1998 | 9.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1999 | 9.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 2000 | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 2001 | 10 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 2002 | 10.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 2003 | 10.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 2004 | 10.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 2005 | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 10.96 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 2007 | 10.98 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.2% |
| 2008 | 11.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.9% |
| 2009 | 10.78 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 2010 | 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
Spain compared with similar countries
- Spain's 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 90% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Spain's 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 93% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Spain changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940 | +47.9% | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 36.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 2 |
| 1860s | 37.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 39.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1870s | 36.17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 3 |
| 1880s | 36.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1890s | 34.84 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 34.41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 30.27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 29.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 24.75 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 22.01 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 20.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 20.87 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 18.63 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 12.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1990s | 9.69 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Spain
- 43 Netherlands 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 44 Poland 10.82 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 45 Greece 10.45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 47 Switzerland 10.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 48 Bulgaria 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 49 Romania 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Spain
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.898 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 10.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 6.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 52.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Spain?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Spain was 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Spain?
- The highest recorded value was 39.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1864.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Spain?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1996.
- How does Spain rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Spain ranks 46th out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Spain?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Spain data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 145 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.