The demographic transition in Sweden in Netherlands
Netherlands: The demographic transition in Sweden was 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 1.1%
World rank
43rd
of 56 countries
All-time high
35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1841
All-time low
11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2010
Years of data
120
1840–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Netherlands, 1840–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
The most recent figure for the demographic transition in sweden in Netherlands is 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population), measured in 2010. That is the lowest value across all 120 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.1% on the previous year and down 14.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Netherlands peaked at 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1841 and was at its lowest, 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2010.
That places Netherlands 43rd out of 56 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 120 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Netherlands, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1840 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1841 | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1842 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1843 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1844 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1845 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1846 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.2% |
| 1847 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.9% |
| 1848 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.2% |
| 1849 | 34.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +13.6% |
| 1900 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.6% |
| 1901 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1902 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1903 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1904 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1905 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1906 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1907 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1908 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1909 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1910 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1911 | 27.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1912 | 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1913 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1914 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.1% |
| 1916 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1917 | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1918 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1919 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1920 | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.2% |
| 1922 | 26.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.7% |
| 1923 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1924 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1925 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1926 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1927 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.9% |
| 1928 | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1929 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1930 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1931 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1932 | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1933 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1934 | 20.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1935 | 20.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1936 | 20.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1938 | 20.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1939 | 20.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1940 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1941 | 20.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1942 | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1943 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.5% |
| 1944 | 24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 1945 | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.8% |
| 1946 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +33.6% |
| 1947 | 27.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.9% |
| 1948 | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.0% |
| 1949 | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.3% |
| 1950 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1951 | 22.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1952 | 22.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 21.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1954 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1955 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1956 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1958 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1960 | 20.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1961 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1962 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1963 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 20.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1965 | 19.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1966 | 19.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1967 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1968 | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1969 | 19.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1970 | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1971 | 17.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.0% |
| 1972 | 16.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 1973 | 14.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.9% |
| 1974 | 13.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1975 | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1976 | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1977 | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1978 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1979 | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1980 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 1981 | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1982 | 12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1983 | 11.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1984 | 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1985 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1986 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1987 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1989 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1990 | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.9% |
| 1991 | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1993 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1994 | 12.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1995 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1996 | 12.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1997 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1998 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1999 | 12.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 2001 | 12.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 2002 | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2003 | 12.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 2004 | 11.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 2005 | 11.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 2006 | 11.32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 2007 | 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 2008 | 11.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 2009 | 11.19 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 2010 | 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
Netherlands compared with similar countries
- Netherlands's 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 95% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Netherlands's 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 99% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Netherlands changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1946 | +33.6% | 22.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840s | 33.14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 30.87 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 26.91 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1930s | 21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 23.87 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 21.69 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 20.04 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 14.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 12.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.73 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.86 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Netherlands
- 40 Albania 11.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 41 Finland 11.38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 42 Canada 11.34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 44 Poland 10.82 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 45 Greece 10.45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 46 Spain 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Netherlands
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5851 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.59 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.47 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6002 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Netherlands?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Netherlands was 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Netherlands?
- The highest recorded value was 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1841.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Netherlands?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010.
- How does Netherlands rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Netherlands ranks 43rd out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Netherlands?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Netherlands data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 120 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.