The demographic transition in Sweden in Romania
Romania: The demographic transition in Sweden was 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
The demographic transition in Sweden in Romania, 1859–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
In 2010, the demographic transition in sweden in Romania stood at 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.4% on the previous year and down 5.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Romania peaked at 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1912 and was at its lowest, 9.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2002.
Romania ranks 49th of 56 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 149 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Romania, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1859 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1860 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.8% |
| 1861 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1862 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1864 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +18.4% |
| 1865 | 34.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1866 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.5% |
| 1867 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1868 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.4% |
| 1869 | 34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1870 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1871 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1872 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1873 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1874 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.5% |
| 1875 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +13.1% |
| 1876 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1877 | 35.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1878 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.0% |
| 1879 | 37.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.8% |
| 1880 | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1881 | 41.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.1% |
| 1882 | 40.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1883 | 42.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.9% |
| 1884 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1885 | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.1% |
| 1886 | 42.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1887 | 41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1888 | 42.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1889 | 40.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1890 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1891 | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.9% |
| 1892 | 39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.8% |
| 1893 | 40.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1894 | 40.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1895 | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1896 | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1897 | 42.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.4% |
| 1898 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.5% |
| 1899 | 42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +14.4% |
| 1900 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.6% |
| 1901 | 39.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1902 | 39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1903 | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1904 | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1906 | 39.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 1907 | 41.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1908 | 40.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1909 | 41.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1910 | 39.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1911 | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.6% |
| 1912 | 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1913 | 42.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1914 | 42.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 40.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1919 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -43.2% |
| 1920 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +46.5% |
| 1921 | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +13.4% |
| 1922 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1923 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1924 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1925 | 35.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1926 | 34.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1927 | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1928 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1929 | 34.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1930 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1931 | 33.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1932 | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.8% |
| 1933 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.6% |
| 1934 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1935 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1936 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1937 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1938 | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1939 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1940 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 1941 | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.2% |
| 1942 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1943 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.3% |
| 1944 | 21.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.3% |
| 1945 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.7% |
| 1946 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +26.5% |
| 1947 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.6% |
| 1948 | 23.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1949 | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +15.5% |
| 1950 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1951 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1952 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1953 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1954 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.2% |
| 1955 | 25.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1956 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.5% |
| 1957 | 22.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1958 | 21.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.7% |
| 1959 | 20.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.5% |
| 1960 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1961 | 17.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.4% |
| 1962 | 16.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.4% |
| 1963 | 15.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1964 | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1965 | 14.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1966 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1967 | 27.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +91.6% |
| 1968 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1969 | 23.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.7% |
| 1970 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.4% |
| 1971 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.6% |
| 1972 | 18.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1973 | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1974 | 20.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.5% |
| 1975 | 19.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1976 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1977 | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1978 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1979 | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1980 | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1981 | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.6% |
| 1982 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.0% |
| 1983 | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.5% |
| 1984 | 15.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.4% |
| 1985 | 15.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1986 | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 1987 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1988 | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1989 | 16 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1990 | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -15.0% |
| 1991 | 11.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.5% |
| 1992 | 11.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1993 | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1994 | 12.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.0% |
| 1995 | 10.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.0% |
| 1996 | 10.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1997 | 10.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1998 | 10.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 10.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 2000 | 10.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 2001 | 9.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.7% |
| 2002 | 9.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 2003 | 9.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 2004 | 10 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 2005 | 10.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 2006 | 10.17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 2007 | 9.97 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 2008 | 10.32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 2009 | 10.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 2010 | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
Romania compared with similar countries
- Romania's 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 85% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Romania's 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 88% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Romania changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1967 | +91.6% | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1920 | +46.5% | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1919 | -43.2% | 40.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
| 1860s | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1870s | 34.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1880s | 41.31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1890s | 40.58 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 42.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 39.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 41.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 38.96 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7 |
| 1920s | 35.51 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 31.96 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 23.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 19.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 23.92 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 19 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 19.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 16.16 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 11.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.08 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Romania
- 46 Spain 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 47 Switzerland 10.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 48 Bulgaria 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 50 Portugal 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 51 Austria 9.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 52 Italy 9.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Romania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.59 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.689 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.59 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 21.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 3.75 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Romania?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Romania was 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Romania?
- The highest recorded value was 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1912.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Romania?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2002.
- How does Romania rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Romania ranks 49th out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Romania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Romania data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 149 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.