The demographic transition in Sweden in Bulgaria
Bulgaria: The demographic transition in Sweden was 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 6.1%
World rank
48th
of 56 countries
All-time high
45.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1914
All-time low
7.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1997
Years of data
130
1881–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Bulgaria, 1881–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Bulgaria recorded 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2010.
The figure is down 6.1% on the previous year and up 11.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Bulgaria peaked at 45.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1914 and was at its lowest, 7.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1997.
That places Bulgaria 48th out of 56 countries with data for 2010, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 130 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Bulgaria, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1881 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1882 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.9% |
| 1883 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.9% |
| 1884 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1886 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.3% |
| 1887 | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +17.8% |
| 1888 | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1889 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1890 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1891 | 39.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.4% |
| 1892 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.9% |
| 1893 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1894 | 38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.6% |
| 1895 | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.1% |
| 1896 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1897 | 42.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1898 | 39.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.3% |
| 1899 | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1900 | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.9% |
| 1901 | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.9% |
| 1902 | 39.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1903 | 41.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.6% |
| 1904 | 42.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1905 | 43.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1906 | 43.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1907 | 43.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1908 | 40.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1909 | 40.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.2% |
| 1910 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1911 | 39.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1912 | 41.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1913 | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -38.4% |
| 1914 | 45.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +75.5% |
| 1915 | 40.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.9% |
| 1916 | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -47.0% |
| 1917 | 17.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -19.2% |
| 1918 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +23.3% |
| 1919 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +54.7% |
| 1920 | 39.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +21.6% |
| 1921 | 40.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1922 | 40.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1923 | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1924 | 39.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.6% |
| 1925 | 36.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.3% |
| 1926 | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1927 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.2% |
| 1928 | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1929 | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.6% |
| 1930 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1931 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1932 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.8% |
| 1933 | 29.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.3% |
| 1934 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1935 | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.3% |
| 1936 | 25.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.9% |
| 1937 | 24.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 1938 | 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.2% |
| 1939 | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1940 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1941 | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1942 | 22.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1943 | 21.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1944 | 22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1945 | 24.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.5% |
| 1946 | 25.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.2% |
| 1947 | 24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.3% |
| 1948 | 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.5% |
| 1949 | 24.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.4% |
| 1950 | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1951 | 21.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -16.3% |
| 1952 | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1953 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1954 | 20.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1955 | 20.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1956 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1957 | 18.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.6% |
| 1958 | 17.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1959 | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1960 | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1961 | 17.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1962 | 16.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1963 | 16.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1964 | 16.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1965 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1966 | 14.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1967 | 15 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1968 | 16.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.7% |
| 1969 | 17 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1970 | 16.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1971 | 15.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1972 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1973 | 16.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.9% |
| 1974 | 17.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.2% |
| 1975 | 16.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1976 | 16.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1977 | 16.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1978 | 15.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1979 | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1980 | 14.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 1981 | 14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1982 | 13.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1983 | 13.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1984 | 13.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1985 | 13.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1986 | 13.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1987 | 13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1988 | 13.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1989 | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.6% |
| 1990 | 11.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.4% |
| 1991 | 10.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.5% |
| 1992 | 10.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1993 | 10 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1994 | 10 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 8.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.0% |
| 1996 | 8.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 7.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.5% |
| 1998 | 7.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1999 | 8.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.4% |
| 2000 | 9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 2001 | 8.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 2002 | 8.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 2003 | 8.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 2004 | 9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 2005 | 9.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 2006 | 9.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 2007 | 9.84 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.4% |
| 2008 | 10.19 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 2009 | 10.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 2010 | 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
Bulgaria compared with similar countries
- Bulgaria's 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 86% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Bulgaria's 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 89% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Bulgaria changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1914 | +75.5% | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 45.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1919 | +54.7% | 21.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1916 | -47.0% | 40.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
| 1913 | -38.4% | 41.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 36.71 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1890s | 38.79 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 42.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 41.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 32.65 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 45.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 36.93 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 27.25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 23.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 20.21 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 16.35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 16.09 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 17.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 13.51 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 12.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 14.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 9.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 9.32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 8.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Bulgaria
- 45 Greece 10.45 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 46 Spain 10.42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 47 Switzerland 10.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 49 Romania 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 50 Portugal 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 51 Austria 9.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Bulgaria
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3067 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2728 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2506 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.608 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.36 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Bulgaria?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Bulgaria was 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Bulgaria?
- The highest recorded value was 45.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1914.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Bulgaria?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1997.
- How does Bulgaria rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Bulgaria ranks 48th out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Bulgaria?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Bulgaria data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 130 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.