The demographic transition in Sweden in Portugal
Portugal: The demographic transition in Sweden was 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010. ▼ Falling
Latest (2010)
9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 1.8%
World rank
50th
of 56 countries
All-time high
38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1911
All-time low
9.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2009
Years of data
125
1886–2010
The demographic transition in Sweden in Portugal, 1886–2010
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Portugal recorded 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2010.
That represents a change of up 1.8% on the previous year and down 17.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Portugal peaked at 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1911 and was at its lowest, 9.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2009.
Portugal ranks 50th of 56 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 125 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Portugal, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1886 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1887 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.6% |
| 1888 | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1889 | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 1890 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1891 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1892 | 31.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1893 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1894 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1895 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1896 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1898 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1899 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1900 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.0% |
| 1901 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.6% |
| 1902 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1903 | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1904 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1905 | 31.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1906 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1907 | 30.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1908 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1909 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1910 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.0% |
| 1911 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +21.8% |
| 1912 | 34.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.6% |
| 1913 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1914 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1915 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1916 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1917 | 31.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1918 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1919 | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.1% |
| 1920 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +21.7% |
| 1921 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1922 | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1923 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1924 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1925 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1926 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1927 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.5% |
| 1928 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1929 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.3% |
| 1930 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1931 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1933 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1934 | 28.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1935 | 28.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1936 | 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1937 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 1938 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1939 | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1940 | 24.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.3% |
| 1941 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1942 | 24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1943 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.6% |
| 1944 | 25.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1945 | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1946 | 25.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1947 | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1948 | 26.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.4% |
| 1949 | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1950 | 24.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1951 | 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1952 | 24.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1953 | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 1954 | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1955 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.6% |
| 1956 | 23.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1957 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 1958 | 24.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 24.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1960 | 24.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1961 | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1962 | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 23.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1964 | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1965 | 22.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1966 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1967 | 21.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1968 | 20.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 1969 | 20.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1970 | 20 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1971 | 20.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1972 | 19.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1973 | 19.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 1974 | 18.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1975 | 19.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1976 | 19.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1977 | 18.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1978 | 17.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.1% |
| 1979 | 16.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1980 | 15.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1981 | 15.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1982 | 15.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1983 | 14.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1984 | 14.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1985 | 12.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.9% |
| 1986 | 12.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1987 | 12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1988 | 11.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1989 | 12 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1990 | 11.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1991 | 11.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 11.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1993 | 11.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1994 | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1995 | 10.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1996 | 11.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1997 | 11.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1998 | 11.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 11.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 11.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
| 2001 | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.2% |
| 2002 | 11 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 10.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 2004 | 10.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 2005 | 10.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 9.96 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.2% |
| 2007 | 9.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 2008 | 9.85 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 2009 | 9.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.0% |
| 2010 | 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.8% |
Portugal compared with similar countries
- Portugal's 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 82% of the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Portugal's 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 11.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 85% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 4 |
| 1890s | 30.79 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1900s | 31.32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 32.26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 28.24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 25.07 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 26.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 24.15 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 23.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 22.86 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 18.82 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 16.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 20.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 13.58 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 15.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 11.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 11.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
Countries ranked near Portugal
- 47 Switzerland 10.22 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 48 Bulgaria 10.02 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 49 Romania 9.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 51 Austria 9.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 52 Italy 9.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 53 Hungary 9.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Portugal
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5144 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4372 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0472 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2572 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Portugal?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Portugal was 9.52 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2010, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Portugal?
- The highest recorded value was 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1911.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Portugal?
- The lowest recorded value was 9.36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009.
- How does Portugal rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Portugal ranks 50th out of 56 countries with data for 2010.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Portugal?
- Over the last ten years it is down 17.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Portugal data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 125 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.