The demographic transition in Sweden in Guyana
Guyana: The demographic transition in Sweden was 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1998. ▲ Rising
Latest (1998)
23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 8.2%
World rank
7th
of 56 countries
All-time high
44.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1957
All-time low
21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1995
Years of data
89
1891–1998
The demographic transition in Sweden in Guyana, 1891–1998
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Guyana recorded 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 1998.
That represents a change of up 8.2% on the previous year and down 5.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Guyana peaked at 44.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1957 and was at its lowest, 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1995.
That places Guyana 7th out of 56 countries with data for 1998, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 89 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Guyana, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1891 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1892 | 28 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.3% |
| 1893 | 27.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.5% |
| 1894 | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.2% |
| 1895 | 28.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +16.5% |
| 1896 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.5% |
| 1897 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1898 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.6% |
| 1899 | 28.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1900 | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +27.4% |
| 1901 | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1902 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.0% |
| 1903 | 29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.2% |
| 1904 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1905 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.9% |
| 1906 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1907 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.0% |
| 1908 | 27.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1909 | 29.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.3% |
| 1910 | 27.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1911 | 28.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1912 | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +14.9% |
| 1913 | 34.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1914 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1915 | 31.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.0% |
| 1916 | 26.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -15.3% |
| 1917 | 28.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.2% |
| 1918 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.6% |
| 1919 | 26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1920 | 32.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +26.5% |
| 1921 | 34.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.9% |
| 1922 | 27.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -19.4% |
| 1923 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.4% |
| 1924 | 32.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.6% |
| 1925 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.4% |
| 1926 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1927 | 32.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.1% |
| 1928 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.2% |
| 1929 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.0% |
| 1930 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.6% |
| 1931 | 31.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.5% |
| 1932 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.5% |
| 1933 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1934 | 29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.6% |
| 1935 | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +19.7% |
| 1936 | 35.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1937 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1938 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -11.5% |
| 1939 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1940 | 35 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +23.7% |
| 1941 | 35.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1942 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.4% |
| 1943 | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -13.4% |
| 1944 | 28.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -14.3% |
| 1945 | 36.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +27.1% |
| 1946 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1947 | 39.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +10.7% |
| 1948 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.1% |
| 1949 | 41.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1950 | 40.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1951 | 42.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.2% |
| 1952 | 43.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1953 | 43.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.2% |
| 1954 | 42.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1955 | 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1956 | 43.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1957 | 44.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1958 | 44.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1959 | 44.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 41.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.3% |
| 1961 | 41.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1962 | 42.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1963 | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1964 | 40.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1965 | 40 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1966 | 39.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1967 | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.0% |
| 1968 | 35.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1969 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.1% |
| 1970 | 33.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1971 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1972 | 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.9% |
| 1973 | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1974 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.0% |
| 1975 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1976 | 30.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.7% |
| 1993 | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -17.7% |
| 1995 | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.7% |
| 1998 | 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.2% |
Guyana compared with similar countries
- Guyana's 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for high income countries, which is 11.61 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 2.0× the median. (34 countries reporting)
- Guyana's 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.3× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 28.91 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1900s | 31.67 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1910s | 29.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1920s | 31.88 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 32.39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 36.66 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 41.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 43.34 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 44.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 39.09 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 42.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 31.59 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7 |
| 1990s | 23.57 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 3 |
Countries ranked near Guyana
- 4 Guatemala 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 5 Mexico 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 6 Colombia 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 8 India 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 9 Israel 21.76 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 10 Fiji 21.37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Guyana
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0396 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0791 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0297 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1326 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0457 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4179 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1619 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Guyana?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Guyana was 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1998, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Guyana?
- The highest recorded value was 44.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1957.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Guyana?
- The lowest recorded value was 21.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1995.
- How does Guyana rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Guyana ranks 7th out of 56 countries with data for 1998.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Guyana?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Guyana data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 89 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.