The demographic transition in Sweden in Colombia
Colombia: The demographic transition in Sweden was 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1998. ▲ Rising
Latest (1998)
24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
6th
of 56 countries
All-time high
40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1959
All-time low
22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1932
Years of data
67
1915–1998
The demographic transition in Sweden in Colombia, 1915–1998
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Colombia recorded 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 1998.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Colombia peaked at 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1959 and was at its lowest, 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 1932.
Colombia ranks 6th of 56 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 67 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Colombia, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1915 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1922 | 27.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1923 | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.3% |
| 1924 | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1925 | 26.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1926 | 27.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.9% |
| 1927 | 27.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1928 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.3% |
| 1929 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1930 | 28.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.6% |
| 1931 | 27.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1932 | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -18.1% |
| 1933 | 28.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +27.9% |
| 1934 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.3% |
| 1935 | 30.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1936 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1937 | 30.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.4% |
| 1938 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.5% |
| 1939 | 31.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1940 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1941 | 32.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1942 | 33.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1943 | 32.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1944 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1945 | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1946 | 32.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.5% |
| 1947 | 33.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 1948 | 34.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1949 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.6% |
| 1950 | 36.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 1951 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1952 | 36.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1953 | 38.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.7% |
| 1954 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.4% |
| 1955 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.3% |
| 1956 | 39.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1957 | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1958 | 40.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1959 | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1960 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.7% |
| 1961 | 39.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 1962 | 39.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1963 | 39.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1964 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1965 | 36.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1966 | 35.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1967 | 35.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1968 | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.3% |
| 1969 | 34.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.1% |
| 1971 | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +9.2% |
| 1972 | 34.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.0% |
| 1973 | 33.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1974 | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1975 | 31.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.4% |
| 1976 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1977 | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.3% |
| 1978 | 30.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1979 | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.0% |
| 1980 | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1981 | 28.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1982 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1983 | 27.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1984 | 27.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1985 | 27.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1993 | 24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -12.4% |
| 1995 | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1998 | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
Colombia compared with similar countries
- Colombia's 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.3× the median. (14 countries reporting)
- Colombia's 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.3× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Colombia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1933 | +27.9% | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 1 |
| 1920s | 27.64 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 8 |
| 1930s | 28.98 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 33.06 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 31.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 38.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 37.04 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 39.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 32.13 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 1980s | 28.18 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 29.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 6 |
| 1990s | 24.33 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 3 |
Countries ranked near Colombia
- 3 Egypt 28.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 4 Guatemala 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 5 Mexico 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 7 Guyana 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 8 India 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 9 Israel 21.76 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Colombia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4113 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 61.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 94.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.24 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Colombia?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Colombia was 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1998, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Colombia?
- The highest recorded value was 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1959.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Colombia?
- The lowest recorded value was 22.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1932.
- How does Colombia rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Colombia ranks 6th out of 56 countries with data for 1998.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Colombia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 10.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Colombia data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 67 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.