The demographic transition in Sweden in Guatemala
Guatemala: The demographic transition in Sweden was 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2008. ▼ Falling
Latest (2008)
27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
down 1.5%
World rank
4th
of 56 countries
All-time high
56.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1930
All-time low
27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2008
Years of data
76
1930–2008
The demographic transition in Sweden in Guatemala, 1930–2008
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
Guatemala recorded 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) for the demographic transition in sweden in 2008. That is the lowest value across all 76 years on record.
That represents a change of down 1.5% on the previous year and down 40.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Guatemala peaked at 56.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1930 and was at its lowest, 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2008.
Guatemala ranks 4th of 56 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 76 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1930 | 56.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1931 | 54.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1932 | 50.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.0% |
| 1933 | 47.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.6% |
| 1934 | 47 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1935 | 48.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.3% |
| 1936 | 47.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1937 | 46.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1938 | 46.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1939 | 47.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.2% |
| 1940 | 48.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1941 | 43.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.1% |
| 1942 | 42.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1943 | 42.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1944 | 42.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 42.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1946 | 48.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +12.4% |
| 1947 | 52.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.3% |
| 1948 | 51.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1949 | 51.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1950 | 50.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1951 | 52.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1952 | 50.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.7% |
| 1953 | 50.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 51.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1955 | 48.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.3% |
| 1956 | 48.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1957 | 49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.2% |
| 1958 | 48.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1959 | 49.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1960 | 48.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.6% |
| 1961 | 49.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.8% |
| 1962 | 47.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1963 | 47.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1964 | 45.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.6% |
| 1965 | 45.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.4% |
| 1966 | 45.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1967 | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -7.5% |
| 1968 | 42.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.9% |
| 1969 | 42.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1970 | 40.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.3% |
| 1971 | 42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 1972 | 43.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1973 | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 1974 | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1975 | 41.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.9% |
| 1976 | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.1% |
| 1977 | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.7% |
| 1978 | 43.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1979 | 44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1980 | 43.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.2% |
| 1981 | 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1982 | 42.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1983 | 40.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1984 | 40.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1985 | 41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.7% |
| 1986 | 39 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.9% |
| 1987 | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1988 | 39.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1989 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1990 | 38.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1991 | 37.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1995 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1996 | 36.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 1997 | 36.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +23.0% |
| 1999 | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -28.4% |
| 2000 | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +15.1% |
| 2001 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 2002 | 32.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -9.3% |
| 2003 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 2004 | 31 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 29.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.8% |
| 2006 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.1% |
| 2007 | 27.44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 2008 | 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 18.43 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.5× the median. (14 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 18.29 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.5× the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where The demographic transition in Sweden in Guatemala changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | -28.4% | 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 49.25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 46.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 56.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 46.58 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 42.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 52.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 49.97 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 48.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 52.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 45.53 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 49.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 42.79 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 44.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 40.75 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 37.76 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 32.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 7 |
| 2000s | 31.06 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 1 Honduras 43.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 2 Serbia 36.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
- 3 Egypt 28.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 5 Mexico 24.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 6 Colombia 24.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
- 7 Guyana 23.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) compare
More reference data data for Guatemala
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1246 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6786 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Guatemala?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Guatemala was 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2008, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 56.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1930.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 27.03 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2008.
- How does Guatemala rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Guatemala ranks 4th out of 56 countries with data for 2008.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is down 40.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 76 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.