The demographic transition in Sweden in Egypt
Egypt: The demographic transition in Sweden was 28.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009. ▼ Falling
Latest (2009)
28.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
Change on year
up 5.7%
World rank
3rd
of 56 countries
All-time high
45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 1930
All-time low
25.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population)
in 2005
Years of data
92
1917–2009
The demographic transition in Sweden in Egypt, 1917–2009
Source: Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in per 1,000 (in the entire population).
Analysis
The most recent figure for the demographic transition in sweden in Egypt is 28.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population), measured in 2009.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.7% on the previous year and up 6.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, the demographic transition in sweden in Egypt peaked at 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1930 and was at its lowest, 25.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population), in 2005.
Egypt ranks 3rd of 56 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 92 years of available data.
The demographic transition in Sweden in Egypt, year by year
| Year | per 1,000 (in the entire population) | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1917 | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | — |
| 1918 | 38.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.0% |
| 1919 | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1920 | 42.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +11.9% |
| 1921 | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.9% |
| 1922 | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1923 | 43.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 43.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.6% |
| 1925 | 42.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1926 | 44.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.0% |
| 1927 | 44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.1% |
| 1928 | 43.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 1929 | 44 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1930 | 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.2% |
| 1931 | 44.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.0% |
| 1932 | 42.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.5% |
| 1933 | 43.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.1% |
| 1934 | 42.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.7% |
| 1935 | 41.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1936 | 44.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.0% |
| 1937 | 43.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 1938 | 43.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.5% |
| 1939 | 42 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1940 | 41.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.7% |
| 1941 | 40.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1942 | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.9% |
| 1943 | 38.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.9% |
| 1944 | 39.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 1945 | 42.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.3% |
| 1946 | 41.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.5% |
| 1947 | 43.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.8% |
| 1948 | 42.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1949 | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.1% |
| 1950 | 44.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.2% |
| 1951 | 44.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.9% |
| 1952 | 45.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.7% |
| 1953 | 42.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.8% |
| 1954 | 42.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.2% |
| 1955 | 40.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.4% |
| 1956 | 40.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1957 | 38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.6% |
| 1958 | 41.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +8.2% |
| 1959 | 42.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +4.1% |
| 1960 | 43 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.5% |
| 1961 | 43.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.1% |
| 1962 | 41.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1963 | 42.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.6% |
| 1964 | 42.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 1965 | 41.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.4% |
| 1966 | 41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.2% |
| 1967 | 39.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.4% |
| 1968 | 38.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 1969 | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.1% |
| 1970 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.1% |
| 1971 | 35.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.3% |
| 1973 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1974 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.1% |
| 1976 | 36.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.3% |
| 1977 | 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1978 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1979 | 40 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +7.5% |
| 1980 | 37.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -6.8% |
| 1981 | 36.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.3% |
| 1982 | 36 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.2% |
| 1983 | 37.2 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.3% |
| 1984 | 38.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.8% |
| 1985 | 37.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1986 | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +6.9% |
| 1987 | 38.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.2% |
| 1988 | 35.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -8.2% |
| 1989 | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -5.9% |
| 1991 | 30 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -10.4% |
| 1992 | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 1993 | 29.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -4.0% |
| 1994 | 29 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.3% |
| 1995 | 27.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -3.8% |
| 1996 | 28.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.4% |
| 1997 | 27.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.8% |
| 1998 | 27.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.8% |
| 2000 | 27.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.5% |
| 2001 | 26.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -2.6% |
| 2002 | 26.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.5% |
| 2003 | 26.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.8% |
| 2004 | 25.68 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -1.6% |
| 2005 | 25.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | -0.7% |
| 2006 | 25.74 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 26.47 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +2.8% |
| 2008 | 27.26 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +3.0% |
| 2009 | 28.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | +5.7% |
Egypt compared with similar countries
- Egypt's 28.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 22.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population), 1.3× the median. (5 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 38.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.7 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 3 |
| 1920s | 43.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 41.8 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 44.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1930s | 43.25 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 41.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1940s | 40.98 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1950s | 42.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 38 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 45.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1960s | 41 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 37 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 43.9 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1970s | 36.23 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 34.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1980s | 37.14 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 33.5 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 40.1 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
| 1990s | 28.51 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 27 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 30.3 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 9 |
| 2000s | 26.6 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 25.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 28.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) | 10 |
Countries ranked near Egypt
More reference data data for Egypt
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2851 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 16.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.956 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4622 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 71.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 6.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is the demographic transition in sweden in Egypt?
- The demographic transition in sweden in Egypt was 28.83 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2009, according to Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Egypt?
- The highest recorded value was 45.4 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 1930.
- What is the lowest the demographic transition in sweden recorded in Egypt?
- The lowest recorded value was 25.49 per 1,000 (in the entire population) in 2005.
- How does Egypt rank for the demographic transition in sweden?
- Egypt ranks 3rd out of 56 countries with data for 2009.
- Is the demographic transition in sweden rising or falling in Egypt?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Egypt data come from?
- The figures come from Mitchell (2013) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of The demographic transition in Sweden. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 92 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Birth and death rates are expressed per 1,000 of the population.