Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Slovenia
Slovenia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate was 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Slovenia, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for control of corruption - governance estimate in Slovenia is 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 1.0% on the previous year and up 11.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Slovenia peaked at 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.6002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2013.
That places Slovenia 54th out of 205 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Slovenia, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.4% |
| 2000 | 0.8333 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -35.3% |
| 2002 | 0.7811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.3% |
| 2003 | 0.7898 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.1% |
| 2004 | 0.8699 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.1% |
| 2005 | 0.8362 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
| 2006 | 0.9609 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.9% |
| 2007 | 0.9858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.6% |
| 2008 | 0.8826 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.5% |
| 2009 | 0.9079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.9% |
| 2010 | 0.7281 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.8% |
| 2011 | 0.6999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
| 2012 | 0.6843 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.2% |
| 2013 | 0.6002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.3% |
| 2014 | 0.6037 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2015 | 0.6575 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.9% |
| 2016 | 0.7621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.9% |
| 2017 | 0.7942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.2% |
| 2018 | 0.8196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2019 | 0.8485 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.5% |
| 2020 | 0.776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.5% |
| 2021 | 0.6987 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.0% |
| 2022 | 0.7481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.1% |
| 2023 | 0.6815 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.9% |
| 2024 | 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.0% |
Slovenia compared with similar countries
- Slovenia's 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.9928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 68% of the median. (73 countries reporting)
- Slovenia's 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.5532 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (53 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.8719 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.7198 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8485 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.776 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Slovenia
- 51 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0.705 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 52 Samoa 0.6881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 53 Costa Rica 0.6792 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 55 Botswana 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 56 Rwanda 0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 57 Cayman Islands 0.6045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Slovenia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.064 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3634 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0228 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3634 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4328 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2921 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3244 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.124 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Slovenia?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Slovenia was 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Slovenia?
- The highest recorded value was 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Slovenia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2013.
- How does Slovenia rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Slovenia ranks 54th out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Slovenia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Slovenia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.