Samoa vs Slovenia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Samoa
- Slovenia
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0.6881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovenia ahead.
Samoa ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 54th of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.1041 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8719 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.3126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7198 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.7702 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Samoa or Slovenia?
- Samoa, at 0.6881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Samoa and Slovenia?
- 0.0138 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Samoa and Slovenia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Samoa ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 54th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.