Botswana vs Slovenia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Botswana
0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Slovenia
0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Botswana rank
55th
Slovenia rank
54th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Botswana
  • Slovenia
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Botswana, a difference of 0.0432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovenia ahead.

Botswana ranks 55th and Slovenia ranks 54th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3345 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovenia
2000s 0.9933 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8719 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1214 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana
2010s 0.8961 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7198 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1763 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana
2020s 0.6624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Botswana or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 0.6743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Botswana as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Botswana and Slovenia?
0.0432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Slovenia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Botswana and Slovenia rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Botswana ranks 55th and Slovenia ranks 54th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Slovenia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/slovenia/">Botswana vs Slovenia: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.