Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Botswana
Botswana: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate was 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. ▼ Falling
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Botswana, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Botswana recorded 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for control of corruption - governance estimate in 2024.
The figure is up 4.0% on the previous year and down 23.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Botswana peaked at 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.6067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2023.
Botswana ranks 55th of 205 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Botswana, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.9915 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.9903 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2000 | 0.9811 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9% |
| 2002 | 0.7837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.1% |
| 2003 | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +58.2% |
| 2004 | 0.9444 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -23.8% |
| 2005 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.0% |
| 2006 | 0.9296 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -20.6% |
| 2007 | 0.9259 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4% |
| 2008 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +11.2% |
| 2009 | 0.9356 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.1% |
| 2010 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.2% |
| 2011 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
| 2012 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.0% |
| 2013 | 0.9806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.3% |
| 2014 | 0.8216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.2% |
| 2015 | 0.7957 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.1% |
| 2016 | 0.8579 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.8% |
| 2017 | 0.7791 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.2% |
| 2018 | 0.8512 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.3% |
| 2019 | 0.8223 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.4% |
| 2020 | 0.7218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.2% |
| 2021 | 0.7019 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.8% |
| 2022 | 0.6507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.3% |
| 2023 | 0.6067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.8% |
| 2024 | 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.0% |
Botswana compared with similar countries
- Botswana's 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Botswana's 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Botswana changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | +58.2% | 0.7837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9903 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9915 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.9933 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.8961 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7791 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7218 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
More reference data data for Botswana
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0472 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0078 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0825 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.97 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0424 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Botswana?
- Control of corruption - governance estimate in Botswana was 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.6067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023.
- How does Botswana rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Botswana ranks 55th out of 205 countries with data for 2024.
- Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.