Botswana vs Cayman Islands: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Botswana
0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Cayman Islands
0.6045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Botswana rank
55th
Cayman Islands rank
57th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Botswana
  • Cayman Islands
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.0266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cayman Islands ahead.

Botswana ranks 55th and Cayman Islands ranks 57th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Cayman Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Cayman Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3695 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cayman Islands
2000s 0.9933 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cayman Islands
2010s 0.8961 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0042 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana
2020s 0.6624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0578 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Botswana or Cayman Islands?
Botswana, at 0.6311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Botswana and Cayman Islands?
0.0266 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Cayman Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Botswana and Cayman Islands rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Botswana ranks 55th and Cayman Islands ranks 57th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Cayman Islands: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/cayman-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/botswana/cayman-islands/">Botswana vs Cayman Islands: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.