Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Afghanistan

Afghanistan: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate was -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024. β–² Rising

Latest (2024)
-1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Change on year
down 9.2%
World rank
186th
of 204 countries
All-time high
-1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2022
All-time low
-1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 1996
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Afghanistan, 1996–2024

-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.21996201020241996: -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.51998: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52000: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52002: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52003: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52004: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52005: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52006: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52007: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52008: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52009: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52010: -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.52011: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52012: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52013: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52014: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52015: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52016: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52017: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52018: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52019: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52020: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52021: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52022: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52023: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52024: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Analysis

The most recent figure for control of corruption - governance estimate in Afghanistan is -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2024.

That represents a change of down 9.2% on the previous year and up 16.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Afghanistan peaked at -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2022 and was at its lowest, -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1996.

That places Afghanistan 186th out of 204 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s -1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.63 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2
2000s -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.64 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 9
2010s -1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.65 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 10
2020s -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 5

Countries ranked near Afghanistan

  1. 183 Myanmar -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  2. 184 Turkmenistan -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  3. 185 Lebanon -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  4. 187 Central African Republic -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  5. 188 Guinea-Bissau -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  6. 189 Chad -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare

See the full ranking of 204 places β†’

More reference data data for Afghanistan

All data for Afghanistan β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Afghanistan?
Control of corruption - governance estimate in Afghanistan was -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Afghanistan?
The highest recorded value was -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2022.
What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Afghanistan?
The lowest recorded value was -1.72 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
How does Afghanistan rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Afghanistan ranks 186th out of 204 countries with data for 2024.
Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Afghanistan?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Afghanistan. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/">Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Afghanistan</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.