Afghanistan vs Myanmar: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time
- Afghanistan
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Myanmar ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 186th and Myanmar ranks 183rd of 204 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1849 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Myanmar |
| 2000s | -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0219 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Myanmar |
| 2010s | -1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Myanmar |
| 2020s | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2469 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Afghanistan or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Afghanistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Afghanistan and Myanmar?
- 0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Myanmar?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Myanmar rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
- Afghanistan ranks 186th and Myanmar ranks 183rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.