Afghanistan vs Chad: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate

Afghanistan
-1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Chad
-1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
186th
Chad rank
189th

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Chad
-1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2199620102024

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chad, a difference of 0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chad ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 186th and Chad ranks 189th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Chad in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Chad Difference Ahead
1990s -1.67 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chad
2000s -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1689 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chad
2010s -1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1236 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chad
2020s -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2036 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher control of corruption - governance estimate, Afghanistan or Chad?
Afghanistan, at -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Chad as of 2024.
What is the difference in control of corruption - governance estimate between Afghanistan and Chad?
0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Chad?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Afghanistan and Chad rank globally for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Afghanistan ranks 186th and Chad ranks 189th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Chad: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/afghanistan/chad/">Afghanistan vs Chad: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,167 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.