Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
-1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Change on year
down 1.8%
World rank
187th
of 208 countries
All-time high
-0.3988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 1996
All-time low
-1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2009
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Zimbabwe, 1996–2025

-1.5-1.2-1-0.75-0.51996201020251996: -0.399 approx. -2.5 to +2.51998: -0.686 approx. -2.5 to +2.52000: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52002: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52003: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52004: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52005: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52006: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52007: -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.52008: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52009: -1.6 approx. -2.5 to +2.52010: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52011: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52012: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52013: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52014: -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.52015: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52016: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52017: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52018: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52019: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52020: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52021: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52022: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52023: -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52024: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.52025: -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Analysis

The most recent figure for control of corruption - governance estimate in Zimbabwe is -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.

That represents a change of down 1.8% on the previous year and up 1.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, control of corruption - governance estimate in Zimbabwe peaked at -0.3988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996 and was at its lowest, -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2009.

Zimbabwe ranks 187th of 208 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Zimbabwe, 1996 to 2025.
Year approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Change
1996 -0.3988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 —
1998 -0.686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +72.0%
2000 -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +87.0%
2002 -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +9.7%
2003 -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +3.7%
2004 -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -3.5%
2005 -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +6.8%
2006 -1.38 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -8.5%
2007 -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +2.2%
2008 -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +10.7%
2009 -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +0.3%
2010 -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -5.0%
2011 -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.2%
2012 -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -11.1%
2013 -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +2.5%
2014 -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +10.8%
2015 -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -11.4%
2016 -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2%
2017 -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3%
2018 -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +1.5%
2019 -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.1%
2020 -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -8.6%
2021 -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +2.3%
2022 -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.5%
2023 -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +0.4%
2024 -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +5.9%
2025 -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +1.8%

Zimbabwe compared with similar countries

  • Zimbabwe's -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.7× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Zimbabwe's -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7919 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Zimbabwe changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2000 -87.0% -0.686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
1998 -72.0% -0.3988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s -0.5424 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2
2000s -1.44 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 9
2010s -1.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 10
2020s -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 6

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 184 Iraq -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  2. 185 Tajikistan -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  3. 186 Cambodia -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  4. 188 Myanmar -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  5. 189 Afghanistan -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  6. 190 Turkmenistan -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is control of corruption - governance estimate in Zimbabwe?
Control of corruption - governance estimate in Zimbabwe was -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was -0.3988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
What is the lowest control of corruption - governance estimate recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009.
How does Zimbabwe rank for control of corruption - governance estimate?
Zimbabwe ranks 187th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is control of corruption - governance estimate rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/control-of-corruption-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/zimbabwe/">Control of Corruption - Governance estimate in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,432 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Control of Corruption (CC) captures perceptions of the extent to which public power is used for private gain, including both petty and grand corruption, as well as capture of the state by elites and private interests. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.