Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score was 1 in 2018. ▬ Flat
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score in Saudi Arabia, 1926–2018
Source: Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2018, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Saudi Arabia stood at 1. That is the highest value across all 93 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Saudi Arabia peaked at 1 in 1926 and was at its lowest, 1, in 1926.
That places Saudi Arabia 117th out of 166 countries with data for 2018, putting it in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
Countries ranked near Saudi Arabia
- 117 Afghanistan 1 compare
- 117 Angola 1 compare
- 117 Azerbaijan 1 compare
- 117 Bahrain 1 compare
- 117 Bangladesh 1 compare
- 117 Belarus 1 compare
- 117 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 compare
- 117 Burundi 1 compare
- 117 China 1 compare
- 117 Cuba 1 compare
- 117 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 compare
- 117 Eritrea 1 compare
- 117 Eswatini 1 compare
- 117 Ethiopia 1 compare
- 117 Iran 1 compare
- 117 Jordan 1 compare
- 117 Kazakhstan 1 compare
- 117 Kuwait 1 compare
- 117 Laos 1 compare
- 117 Morocco 1 compare
- 117 North Korea 1 compare
- 117 Oman 1 compare
- 117 Qatar 1 compare
- 117 Syria 1 compare
- 117 Tajikistan 1 compare
- 117 Togo 1 compare
- 117 Turkmenistan 1 compare
- 117 United Arab Emirates 1 compare
- 117 Uzbekistan 1 compare
- 117 Vatican 1
- 117 Venezuela 1 compare
- 117 Vietnam 1 compare
More reference data data for Saudi Arabia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1847 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9641 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 10.64 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0139 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2207 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6194 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Saudi Arabia?
- Competitiveness of executive recruitment score in Saudi Arabia was 1 in 2018, according to Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Saudi Arabia?
- The highest recorded value was 1 in 1926.
- What is the lowest competitiveness of executive recruitment score recorded in Saudi Arabia?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 in 1926.
- How does Saudi Arabia rank for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 117th out of 166 countries with data for 2018.
- Is competitiveness of executive recruitment score rising or falling in Saudi Arabia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Saudi Arabia data come from?
- The figures come from Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 93 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).