Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Saudi Arabia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
1
in 1991
Saudi Arabia
1
in 2018
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
118th
Saudi Arabia rank
118th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1 against 1 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
Across all 58 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Saudi Arabia ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Saudi Arabia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1 against 1 in Saudi Arabia as of 1991.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Saudi Arabia?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1926 to 1991.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Saudi Arabia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Saudi Arabia ranks 118th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).