Cuba vs Saudi Arabia: Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score
Cuba
1
in 2018
Saudi Arabia
1
in 2018
Cuba rank
118th
Saudi Arabia rank
118th
Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score over time
- Cuba
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1 against 1 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 88 shared years of data; in 1926 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 118th and Saudi Arabia ranks 118th of 167 countries.
Across the 10 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 4 and Saudi Arabia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Cuba |
| 1930s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Cuba |
| 1940s | 3 | 1 | 2 | Cuba |
| 1950s | 1.67 | 1 | 0.6667 | Cuba |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Saudi Arabia |
| 1990s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher competitiveness of executive recruitment score, Cuba or Saudi Arabia?
- Cuba, at 1 against 1 in Saudi Arabia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in competitiveness of executive recruitment score between Cuba and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Saudi Arabia?
- 88 years are reported by both, from 1926 to 2018.
- How do Cuba and Saudi Arabia rank globally for competitiveness of executive recruitment score?
- Cuba ranks 118th and Saudi Arabia ranks 118th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Polity 5 (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Competitiveness of Executive Recruitment Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates the extent to which executive recruitment is competitive. It ranges from executive power being seized (score of 0), over the executive being selected by elites (score of 1), and dual selection-election or transitional arrangements (score of 2), to the executive being elected (score of 4).