Czechia vs Uruguay: Clientelism Index
Czechia
0.068
in 2025
Uruguay
0.085
in 2025
Czechia rank
162nd
Uruguay rank
159th
Clientelism Index over time
- Czechia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.085 against 0.068 in Czechia, a difference of 0.017.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 162nd and Uruguay ranks 159th of 176 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.358 | 0.2905 | 0.0675 | Czechia |
| 1920s | 0.2115 | 0.4485 | 0.237 | Uruguay |
| 1930s | 0.2472 | 0.4613 | 0.2141 | Uruguay |
| 1940s | 0.6201 | 0.4449 | 0.1752 | Czechia |
| 1950s | 0.3178 | 0.3918 | 0.074 | Uruguay |
| 1960s | 0.3202 | 0.3735 | 0.0533 | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 0.3203 | 0.3485 | 0.0282 | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 0.2795 | 0.2426 | 0.0369 | Czechia |
| 1990s | 0.0699 | 0.091 | 0.0211 | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0651 | 0.056 | 0.0091 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.0981 | 0.0342 | 0.0639 | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.0895 | 0.1053 | 0.0158 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Czechia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.085 against 0.068 in Czechia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Czechia and Uruguay?
- 0.017, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Uruguay?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Uruguay rank globally for clientelism index?
- Czechia ranks 162nd and Uruguay ranks 159th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.