Clientelism Index in Tunisia
Tunisia: Clientelism Index was 0.298 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Clientelism Index in Tunisia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, clientelism index in Tunisia stood at 0.298.
The figure is down 7.2% on the previous year and up 7.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, clientelism index in Tunisia peaked at 0.928 in 1789 and was at its lowest, 0.23, in 2021.
Tunisia ranks 125th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 237 years of available data.
Clientelism Index in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.928 | — |
| 1790 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.928 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.871 | -6.1% |
| 1858 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.871 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.9 | +3.3% |
| 1879 | 0.9 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.9 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.861 | -4.3% |
| 1882 | 0.876 | +1.7% |
| 1883 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.876 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.825 | -5.8% |
| 1908 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.825 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.795 | -3.6% |
| 1951 | 0.795 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.795 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.795 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.795 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.795 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.669 | -15.8% |
| 1957 | 0.465 | -30.5% |
| 1958 | 0.483 | +3.9% |
| 1959 | 0.51 | +5.6% |
| 1960 | 0.67 | +31.4% |
| 1961 | 0.67 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.67 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.67 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.667 | -0.4% |
| 1965 | 0.645 | -3.3% |
| 1966 | 0.645 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.645 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.645 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.645 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.644 | -0.2% |
| 1971 | 0.644 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.644 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.696 | +8.1% |
| 1974 | 0.653 | -6.2% |
| 1975 | 0.718 | +10.0% |
| 1976 | 0.718 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.718 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.718 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.664 | -7.5% |
| 1980 | 0.663 | -0.2% |
| 1981 | 0.66 | -0.5% |
| 1982 | 0.646 | -2.1% |
| 1983 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.646 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.714 | +10.5% |
| 1986 | 0.716 | +0.3% |
| 1987 | 0.638 | -10.9% |
| 1988 | 0.557 | -12.7% |
| 1989 | 0.651 | +16.9% |
| 1990 | 0.682 | +4.8% |
| 1991 | 0.682 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.682 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.735 | +7.8% |
| 1994 | 0.759 | +3.3% |
| 1995 | 0.766 | +0.9% |
| 1996 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.766 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.768 | +0.3% |
| 2000 | 0.779 | +1.4% |
| 2001 | 0.779 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.779 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.779 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.776 | -0.4% |
| 2005 | 0.765 | -1.4% |
| 2006 | 0.765 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.765 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.765 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.763 | -0.3% |
| 2010 | 0.753 | -1.3% |
| 2011 | 0.535 | -29.0% |
| 2012 | 0.329 | -38.5% |
| 2013 | 0.255 | -22.5% |
| 2014 | 0.273 | +7.1% |
| 2015 | 0.277 | +1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.246 | -11.2% |
| 2017 | 0.262 | +6.5% |
| 2018 | 0.262 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.258 | -1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.238 | -7.8% |
| 2021 | 0.23 | -3.4% |
| 2022 | 0.248 | +7.8% |
| 2023 | 0.314 | +26.6% |
| 2024 | 0.321 | +2.2% |
| 2025 | 0.298 | -7.2% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 0.298 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.6325, 47% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 0.298 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.572, 52% of the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.928 | 0.928 | 0.928 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.928 | 0.928 | 0.928 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.928 | 0.928 | 0.928 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.928 | 0.928 | 0.928 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.928 | 0.928 | 0.928 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.928 | 0.928 | 0.928 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.928 | 0.928 | 0.928 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.9109 | 0.871 | 0.928 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.871 | 0.871 | 0.871 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.8768 | 0.871 | 0.9 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.8769 | 0.861 | 0.9 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.876 | 0.876 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.8607 | 0.825 | 0.876 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.825 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.825 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.825 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.825 | 0.825 | 0.825 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.6897 | 0.465 | 0.795 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.6572 | 0.645 | 0.67 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.6817 | 0.644 | 0.718 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6537 | 0.557 | 0.716 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7372 | 0.682 | 0.768 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.7715 | 0.763 | 0.779 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.345 | 0.246 | 0.753 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2748 | 0.23 | 0.321 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More reference data data for Tunisia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.148 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1317 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4961 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7169 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is clientelism index in Tunisia?
- Clientelism index in Tunisia was 0.298 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest clientelism index recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.928 in 1789.
- What is the lowest clientelism index recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.23 in 2021.
- How does Tunisia rank for clientelism index?
- Tunisia ranks 125th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is clientelism index rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Clientelism Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.