Rwanda vs Tunisia: Clientelism Index
Rwanda
0.298
in 2025
Tunisia
0.298
in 2025
Rwanda rank
125th
Tunisia rank
125th
Clientelism Index over time
- Rwanda
- Tunisia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.298 against 0.298 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 110 shared years of data; in 1916 it was Tunisia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 125th and Tunisia ranks 125th of 176 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0.715 | 0.825 | 0.11 | Tunisia |
| 1920s | 0.715 | 0.825 | 0.11 | Tunisia |
| 1930s | 0.715 | 0.825 | 0.11 | Tunisia |
| 1940s | 0.715 | 0.825 | 0.11 | Tunisia |
| 1950s | 0.6893 | 0.6897 | 0.0004 | Tunisia |
| 1960s | 0.4654 | 0.6572 | 0.1918 | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 0.4275 | 0.6817 | 0.2542 | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 0.304 | 0.6537 | 0.3497 | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 0.3069 | 0.7372 | 0.4303 | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.3395 | 0.7715 | 0.432 | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.1976 | 0.345 | 0.1474 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.2118 | 0.2748 | 0.063 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher clientelism index, Rwanda or Tunisia?
- Rwanda, at 0.298 against 0.298 in Tunisia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in clientelism index between Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 0, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Tunisia rank globally for clientelism index?
- Rwanda ranks 125th and Tunisia ranks 125th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Clientelism Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.