Clientelism Index in Austria
Austria: Clientelism Index was 0.105 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Clientelism Index in Austria, 1848–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Austria recorded 0.105 for clientelism index in 2025.
That represents a change of up 7.1% on the previous year and up 54.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, clientelism index in Austria peaked at 0.659 in 1848 and was at its lowest, 0.062, in 2014.
That places Austria 152nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Clientelism Index in Austria, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1848 | 0.659 | — |
| 1849 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.659 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.5 | -24.1% |
| 1868 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.5 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.502 | +0.4% |
| 1872 | 0.502 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.501 | -0.2% |
| 1874 | 0.501 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.501 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.501 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.501 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.501 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.502 | +0.2% |
| 1880 | 0.502 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.502 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.502 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.502 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.502 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.394 | -21.5% |
| 1886 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.394 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.557 | +41.4% |
| 1890 | 0.557 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.57 | +2.3% |
| 1892 | 0.471 | -17.4% |
| 1893 | 0.471 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.471 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.471 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.471 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.465 | -1.3% |
| 1898 | 0.465 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.465 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.454 | -2.4% |
| 1901 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.454 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.458 | +0.9% |
| 1908 | 0.459 | +0.2% |
| 1909 | 0.459 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.459 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.42 | -8.5% |
| 1912 | 0.392 | -6.7% |
| 1913 | 0.392 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.442 | +12.8% |
| 1915 | 0.442 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.442 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.442 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.442 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.296 | -33.0% |
| 1920 | 0.289 | -2.4% |
| 1921 | 0.294 | +1.7% |
| 1922 | 0.294 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.296 | +0.7% |
| 1924 | 0.305 | +3.0% |
| 1925 | 0.305 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.305 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.294 | -3.6% |
| 1928 | 0.289 | -1.7% |
| 1929 | 0.289 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.279 | -3.5% |
| 1931 | 0.218 | -21.9% |
| 1932 | 0.218 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.203 | -6.9% |
| 1934 | 0.424 | +108.9% |
| 1935 | 0.424 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.424 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.424 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.537 | +26.7% |
| 1946 | 0.313 | -41.7% |
| 1947 | 0.313 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.313 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.314 | +0.3% |
| 1950 | 0.317 | +1.0% |
| 1951 | 0.326 | +2.8% |
| 1952 | 0.33 | +1.2% |
| 1953 | 0.319 | -3.3% |
| 1954 | 0.317 | -0.6% |
| 1955 | 0.317 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.329 | +3.8% |
| 1957 | 0.329 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.329 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.336 | +2.1% |
| 1960 | 0.341 | +1.5% |
| 1961 | 0.341 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.341 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.289 | -15.2% |
| 1964 | 0.289 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.288 | -0.3% |
| 1966 | 0.286 | -0.7% |
| 1967 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.239 | -16.4% |
| 1971 | 0.21 | -12.1% |
| 1972 | 0.207 | -1.4% |
| 1973 | 0.207 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.213 | +2.9% |
| 1975 | 0.219 | +2.8% |
| 1976 | 0.222 | +1.4% |
| 1977 | 0.222 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.222 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.215 | -3.2% |
| 1980 | 0.176 | -18.1% |
| 1981 | 0.17 | -3.4% |
| 1982 | 0.17 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.172 | +1.2% |
| 1984 | 0.173 | +0.6% |
| 1985 | 0.173 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.153 | -11.6% |
| 1987 | 0.154 | +0.7% |
| 1988 | 0.154 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.154 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.142 | -7.8% |
| 1991 | 0.154 | +8.5% |
| 1992 | 0.143 | -7.1% |
| 1993 | 0.138 | -3.5% |
| 1994 | 0.14 | +1.4% |
| 1995 | 0.098 | -30.0% |
| 1996 | 0.103 | +5.1% |
| 1997 | 0.074 | -28.2% |
| 1998 | 0.078 | +5.4% |
| 1999 | 0.079 | +1.3% |
| 2000 | 0.076 | -3.8% |
| 2001 | 0.076 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.077 | +1.3% |
| 2003 | 0.08 | +3.9% |
| 2004 | 0.079 | -1.3% |
| 2005 | 0.079 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.076 | -3.8% |
| 2007 | 0.068 | -10.5% |
| 2008 | 0.069 | +1.5% |
| 2009 | 0.071 | +2.9% |
| 2010 | 0.068 | -4.2% |
| 2011 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.068 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.066 | -2.9% |
| 2014 | 0.062 | -6.1% |
| 2015 | 0.068 | +9.7% |
| 2016 | 0.07 | +2.9% |
| 2017 | 0.098 | +40.0% |
| 2018 | 0.098 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.099 | +1.0% |
| 2020 | 0.086 | -13.1% |
| 2021 | 0.086 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.086 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.095 | +10.5% |
| 2024 | 0.098 | +3.2% |
| 2025 | 0.105 | +7.1% |
Austria compared with similar countries
- Austria's 0.105 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.131, 80% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Austria's 0.105 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.182, 58% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840s | 0.659 | 0.659 | 0.659 | 2 |
| 1850s | 0.659 | 0.659 | 0.659 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.6113 | 0.5 | 0.659 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.5012 | 0.5 | 0.502 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.4643 | 0.394 | 0.557 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.4877 | 0.465 | 0.57 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.4554 | 0.454 | 0.459 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.4169 | 0.296 | 0.459 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.296 | 0.289 | 0.305 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.3267 | 0.203 | 0.424 | 8 |
| 1940s | 0.358 | 0.313 | 0.537 | 5 |
| 1950s | 0.3249 | 0.317 | 0.336 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.3033 | 0.286 | 0.341 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.2176 | 0.207 | 0.239 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1649 | 0.153 | 0.176 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1149 | 0.074 | 0.154 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0751 | 0.068 | 0.08 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0765 | 0.062 | 0.099 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0927 | 0.086 | 0.105 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Austria
- 149 Costa Rica 0.129 compare
- 150 South Korea 0.123 compare
- 151 Belarus 0.118 compare
- 152 United States 0.105 compare
- 154 Sri Lanka 0.104 compare
- 155 Israel 0.1 compare
- 155 Spain 0.1 compare
More reference data data for Austria
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6222 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2597 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.08 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is clientelism index in Austria?
- Clientelism index in Austria was 0.105 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest clientelism index recorded in Austria?
- The highest recorded value was 0.659 in 1848.
- What is the lowest clientelism index recorded in Austria?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.062 in 2014.
- How does Austria rank for clientelism index?
- Austria ranks 152nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is clientelism index rising or falling in Austria?
- Over the last ten years it is up 54.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Austria data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Clientelism Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 171 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Composite index measuring the extent to which politics hinge on clientelistic exchanges of targeted goods, jobs, or cash for electoral support; higher values denote more pervasive clientelism.