Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Belarus
Belarus: Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines was 170.98 kilograms per year per capita in 2023. ▲ Rising
Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Belarus, 1992–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in kilograms per year per capita.
Analysis
In 2023, average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Belarus stood at 170.98 kilograms per year per capita.
That represents a change of down 2.6% on the previous year and down 14.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Belarus peaked at 237.86 kilograms per year per capita in 2021 and was at its lowest, 54.64 kilograms per year per capita, in 1998.
That places Belarus 133rd out of 191 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 98.92 kilograms per year per capita | 54.64 kilograms per year per capita | 123.44 kilograms per year per capita | 8 |
| 2000s | 148.1 kilograms per year per capita | 71.82 kilograms per year per capita | 184.64 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2010s | 197.73 kilograms per year per capita | 155.25 kilograms per year per capita | 216.08 kilograms per year per capita | 10 |
| 2020s | 203.35 kilograms per year per capita | 170.98 kilograms per year per capita | 237.86 kilograms per year per capita | 4 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 130 Suriname 172.56 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 131 Latvia 171.17 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 132 Cote d'Ivoire 171 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 134 Slovakia 167.52 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 135 Belize 166.95 kilograms per year per capita compare
- 136 Malaysia 164.37 kilograms per year per capita compare
More reference data data for Belarus
- Spring temperature anomalies 4.96 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 1.14 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month -6.27 °C (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 2.19 °C (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies 2.92 °C (2025)
- Consumer price index 801.16 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Competitive elections 0 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Belarus?
- Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines in Belarus was 170.98 kilograms per year per capita in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 237.86 kilograms per year per capita in 2021.
- What is the lowest average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 54.64 kilograms per year per capita in 1998.
- How does Belarus rank for average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines?
- Belarus ranks 133rd out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Average per capita fruit intake vs. minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.