Belarus vs Latvia: Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines
Belarus
170.98
in 2023
Latvia
171.17
in 2023
Belarus rank
133rd
Latvia rank
131st
Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines over time
- Belarus
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 171.17 against 170.98 in Belarus, a difference of 0.19.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 133rd and Latvia ranks 131st of 192 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 98.92 | 116.85 | 17.93 | Latvia |
| 2000s | 148.1 | 151.01 | 2.91 | Latvia |
| 2010s | 197.73 | 139.39 | 58.34 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 203.35 | 175.63 | 27.72 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines, Belarus or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 171.17 against 170.98 in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines between Belarus and Latvia?
- 0.19, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Latvia rank globally for average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines?
- Belarus ranks 133rd and Latvia ranks 131st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Average per capita fruit intake vs minimum recommended guidelines. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.