Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Namibia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.9915 GPIA
in 2019
Namibia
1.1 GPIA
in 2017
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
33rd
Namibia rank
32nd

Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Namibia
00.250.50.7511.2199220052019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1.1 GPIA against 0.9915 GPIA in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.1085 GPIA.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 32nd of 42 groups.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9903 GPIA 1.11 GPIA 0.1195 GPIA Namibia
2000s 0.9756 GPIA 1.1 GPIA 0.1261 GPIA Namibia
2010s 0.9861 GPIA 1.1 GPIA 0.1142 GPIA Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Namibia?
Namibia, at 1.1 GPIA against 0.9915 GPIA in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2017.
What is the difference in gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Namibia?
0.1085 GPIA, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Namibia?
12 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Namibia rank globally for gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 32nd of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Namibia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-adjusted-gender/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-intake-ratio-to-the-last-grade-of-lower-secondary-general-education-adjusted-gender/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/namibia/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Namibia: Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,995 data points, 1970–2020
Last refreshed

The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/