Voice and Accountability in Uganda
Uganda: Voice and Accountability was 0.1098 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability in Uganda, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
Uganda recorded 0.1098 standard error for voice and accountability in 2011.
The figure is up 1.3% on the previous year and down 48.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability in Uganda peaked at 0.2318 standard error in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.108 standard error, in 2006.
That places Uganda 47th out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability in Uganda, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2211 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.2318 standard error | +4.8% |
| 2000 | 0.2116 standard error | -8.7% |
| 2002 | 0.1655 standard error | -21.8% |
| 2003 | 0.1466 standard error | -11.4% |
| 2004 | 0.1507 standard error | +2.9% |
| 2005 | 0.1396 standard error | -7.4% |
| 2006 | 0.108 standard error | -22.6% |
| 2007 | 0.1103 standard error | +2.1% |
| 2008 | 0.1082 standard error | -1.9% |
| 2009 | 0.1091 standard error | +0.8% |
| 2010 | 0.1084 standard error | -0.6% |
| 2011 | 0.1098 standard error | +1.3% |
Uganda compared with similar countries
- Uganda's 0.1098 standard error is below the median for low income countries, which is 0.1175 standard error, 93% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Uganda's 0.1098 standard error is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1248 standard error, 88% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.2211 standard error | 0.2318 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1389 standard error | 0.108 standard error | 0.2116 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1091 standard error | 0.1084 standard error | 0.1098 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Uganda
More reference data data for Uganda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 29.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 42.22 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.29 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability in Uganda?
- Voice and accountability in Uganda was 0.1098 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest voice and accountability recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2318 standard error in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.108 standard error in 2006.
- How does Uganda rank for voice and accountability?
- Uganda ranks 47th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is voice and accountability rising or falling in Uganda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 48.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.