Angola vs Uganda: Voice and Accountability
Angola
0.1108 standard error
in 2011
Uganda
0.1098 standard error
in 2011
Angola rank
46th
Uganda rank
47th
Voice and Accountability over time
- Angola
- Uganda
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0.1108 standard error against 0.1098 standard error in Uganda, a difference of 0.001 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Uganda ahead.
Angola ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 47th of 53 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.2265 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.1457 standard error | 0.1389 standard error | 0.0069 standard error | Angola |
| 2010s | 0.1102 standard error | 0.1091 standard error | 0.0011 standard error | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Angola or Uganda?
- Angola, at 0.1108 standard error against 0.1098 standard error in Uganda as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Angola and Uganda?
- 0.001 standard error, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Uganda?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Angola and Uganda rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Angola ranks 46th and Uganda ranks 47th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.