Voice and Accountability in Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso: Voice and Accountability was 0.1098 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability in Burkina Faso, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
Burkina Faso recorded 0.1098 standard error for voice and accountability in 2011. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
The figure is down 52.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability in Burkina Faso peaked at 0.2606 standard error in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.1098 standard error, in 2011.
Burkina Faso ranks 47th of 53 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability in Burkina Faso, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2441 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.2606 standard error | +6.8% |
| 2000 | 0.2323 standard error | -10.9% |
| 2002 | 0.1761 standard error | -24.2% |
| 2003 | 0.1736 standard error | -1.4% |
| 2004 | 0.1687 standard error | -2.8% |
| 2005 | 0.1584 standard error | -6.1% |
| 2006 | 0.1131 standard error | -28.6% |
| 2007 | 0.1153 standard error | +2.0% |
| 2008 | 0.1105 standard error | -4.1% |
| 2009 | 0.111 standard error | +0.5% |
| 2010 | 0.1098 standard error | -1.1% |
| 2011 | 0.1098 standard error | -0.0% |
Burkina Faso compared with similar countries
- Burkina Faso's 0.1098 standard error is below the median for low income countries, which is 0.1175 standard error, 93% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Burkina Faso's 0.1098 standard error is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.1248 standard error, 88% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2523 standard error | 0.2441 standard error | 0.2606 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.151 standard error | 0.1105 standard error | 0.2323 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1098 standard error | 0.1098 standard error | 0.1098 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Burkina Faso
More reference data data for Burkina Faso
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9232 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4137 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 9.33 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 3.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 33.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 45.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.25 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability in Burkina Faso?
- Voice and accountability in Burkina Faso was 0.1098 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest voice and accountability recorded in Burkina Faso?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2606 standard error in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability recorded in Burkina Faso?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1098 standard error in 2011.
- How does Burkina Faso rank for voice and accountability?
- Burkina Faso ranks 47th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is voice and accountability rising or falling in Burkina Faso?
- Over the last ten years it is down 52.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Burkina Faso data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.