Voice and Accountability in Algeria
Algeria: Voice and Accountability was 0.1134 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability in Algeria, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
The most recent figure for voice and accountability in Algeria is 0.1134 standard error, measured in 2011.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.3% on the previous year and down 46.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability in Algeria peaked at 0.2318 standard error in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.1091 standard error, in 2008.
Algeria ranks 36th of 53 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability in Algeria, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2211 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.2318 standard error | +4.8% |
| 2000 | 0.2116 standard error | -8.7% |
| 2002 | 0.1655 standard error | -21.8% |
| 2003 | 0.1583 standard error | -4.4% |
| 2004 | 0.1429 standard error | -9.7% |
| 2005 | 0.1425 standard error | -0.3% |
| 2006 | 0.1136 standard error | -20.3% |
| 2007 | 0.1118 standard error | -1.5% |
| 2008 | 0.1091 standard error | -2.4% |
| 2009 | 0.1105 standard error | +1.3% |
| 2010 | 0.1098 standard error | -0.6% |
| 2011 | 0.1134 standard error | +3.3% |
Algeria compared with similar countries
- Algeria's 0.1134 standard error is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.1309 standard error, 87% of the median. (8 countries reporting)
- Algeria's 0.1134 standard error is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.1147 standard error, 99% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.2211 standard error | 0.2318 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1406 standard error | 0.1091 standard error | 0.2116 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1116 standard error | 0.1098 standard error | 0.1134 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Algeria
More reference data data for Algeria
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2569 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2959 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8614 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3259 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 22.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.61 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability in Algeria?
- Voice and accountability in Algeria was 0.1134 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest voice and accountability recorded in Algeria?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2318 standard error in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability recorded in Algeria?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1091 standard error in 2008.
- How does Algeria rank for voice and accountability?
- Algeria ranks 36th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is voice and accountability rising or falling in Algeria?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Algeria data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.