Algeria vs Cote d'Ivoire: Voice and Accountability
Algeria
0.1134 standard error
in 2011
Cote d'Ivoire
0.1135 standard error
in 2011
Algeria rank
36th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
35th
Voice and Accountability over time
- Algeria
- Cote d'Ivoire
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0.1135 standard error against 0.1134 standard error in Algeria, a difference of 0.0001 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Cote d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.
Algeria ranks 36th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 35th of 53 countries.
Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Cote d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.2265 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.1406 standard error | 0.1522 standard error | 0.0116 standard error | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 0.1116 standard error | 0.1129 standard error | 0.0013 standard error | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Algeria or Cote d'Ivoire?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 0.1135 standard error against 0.1134 standard error in Algeria as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Algeria and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 0.0001 standard error, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Cote d'Ivoire?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Algeria and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Algeria ranks 36th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 35th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.