Voice and Accountability in Morocco
Morocco: Voice and Accountability was 0.1135 standard error in 2011. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability in Morocco, 1996–2011
Source: World Bank Institute. Measured in standard error.
Analysis
Morocco recorded 0.1135 standard error for voice and accountability in 2011.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.6% on the previous year and down 46.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability in Morocco peaked at 0.2318 standard error in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0.109 standard error, in 2008.
That places Morocco 34th out of 53 countries with data for 2011, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability in Morocco, year by year
| Year | standard error | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.2211 standard error | — |
| 1998 | 0.2318 standard error | +4.8% |
| 2000 | 0.2116 standard error | -8.7% |
| 2002 | 0.1631 standard error | -22.9% |
| 2003 | 0.1466 standard error | -10.1% |
| 2004 | 0.1429 standard error | -2.6% |
| 2005 | 0.1425 standard error | -0.3% |
| 2006 | 0.1131 standard error | -20.6% |
| 2007 | 0.1153 standard error | +2.0% |
| 2008 | 0.109 standard error | -5.5% |
| 2009 | 0.1103 standard error | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 0.1096 standard error | -0.6% |
| 2011 | 0.1135 standard error | +3.6% |
Morocco compared with similar countries
- Morocco's 0.1135 standard error is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.1161 standard error, 98% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
- Morocco's 0.1135 standard error is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.1147 standard error, 99% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2265 standard error | 0.2211 standard error | 0.2318 standard error | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.1394 standard error | 0.109 standard error | 0.2116 standard error | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.1115 standard error | 0.1096 standard error | 0.1135 standard error | 2 |
Countries ranked near Morocco
More reference data data for Morocco
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4441 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4159 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 21.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.42 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability in Morocco?
- Voice and accountability in Morocco was 0.1135 standard error in 2011, according to World Bank Institute.
- What is the highest voice and accountability recorded in Morocco?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2318 standard error in 1998.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability recorded in Morocco?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.109 standard error in 2008.
- How does Morocco rank for voice and accountability?
- Morocco ranks 34th out of 53 countries with data for 2011.
- Is voice and accountability rising or falling in Morocco?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Morocco data come from?
- The figures come from World Bank Institute, published as part of Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.