Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Mongolia

Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 62.04 0-100 in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
62.04 0-100
Change on year
up 0.8%
World rank
89th
of 208 countries
All-time high
66.82 0-100
in 1998
All-time low
60.32 0-100
in 2012
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mongolia, 1996–2025

02040601996201020251996: 65.2 0-1001998: 66.8 0-1002000: 63 0-1002002: 63.8 0-1002003: 64.6 0-1002004: 64.2 0-1002005: 62.9 0-1002006: 63 0-1002007: 63.6 0-1002008: 62.8 0-1002009: 62.5 0-1002010: 62.9 0-1002011: 62.5 0-1002012: 60.3 0-1002013: 61.3 0-1002014: 62.8 0-1002015: 62.7 0-1002016: 63.3 0-1002017: 63 0-1002018: 62.6 0-1002019: 62.6 0-1002020: 62.8 0-1002021: 62 0-1002022: 61.8 0-1002023: 62.2 0-1002024: 61.5 0-1002025: 62 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia stood at 62.04 0-100.

That represents a change of up 0.8% on the previous year and down 1.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia peaked at 66.82 0-100 in 1998 and was at its lowest, 60.32 0-100, in 2012.

Mongolia ranks 89th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Mongolia, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 65.22 0-100 —
1998 66.82 0-100 +2.5%
2000 62.97 0-100 -5.8%
2002 63.84 0-100 +1.4%
2003 64.6 0-100 +1.2%
2004 64.2 0-100 -0.6%
2005 62.86 0-100 -2.1%
2006 63 0-100 +0.2%
2007 63.64 0-100 +1.0%
2008 62.78 0-100 -1.4%
2009 62.51 0-100 -0.4%
2010 62.93 0-100 +0.7%
2011 62.49 0-100 -0.7%
2012 60.32 0-100 -3.5%
2013 61.33 0-100 +1.7%
2014 62.78 0-100 +2.4%
2015 62.65 0-100 -0.2%
2016 63.33 0-100 +1.1%
2017 63.04 0-100 -0.5%
2018 62.62 0-100 -0.7%
2019 62.56 0-100 -0.1%
2020 62.82 0-100 +0.4%
2021 62.04 0-100 -1.2%
2022 61.77 0-100 -0.5%
2023 62.16 0-100 +0.6%
2024 61.55 0-100 -1.0%
2025 62.04 0-100 +0.8%

Mongolia compared with similar countries

  • Mongolia's 62.04 0-100 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 56.73 0-100, 1.1× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Mongolia's 62.04 0-100 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 63.85 0-100, 97% of the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 66.02 0-100 65.22 0-100 66.82 0-100 2
2000s 63.38 0-100 62.51 0-100 64.6 0-100 9
2010s 62.41 0-100 60.32 0-100 63.33 0-100 10
2020s 62.06 0-100 61.55 0-100 62.82 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 86 Bulgaria 62.65 0-100 compare
  2. 87 Moldova 62.54 0-100 compare
  3. 88 Suriname 62.09 0-100 compare
  4. 90 Fiji 61.68 0-100 compare
  5. 91 Bhutan 61.6 0-100 compare
  6. 92 Belize 61.56 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia was 62.04 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 66.82 0-100 in 1998.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 60.32 0-100 in 2012.
How does Mongolia rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Mongolia ranks 89th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/mongolia/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).