Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mongolia

Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 59.07 0-100 in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
59.07 0-100
Change on year
down 1.1%
World rank
93rd
of 207 countries
All-time high
64.65 0-100
in 1998
All-time low
57.68 0-100
in 2012
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mongolia, 1996–2024

02040601996201020241996: 63.1 0-1001998: 64.7 0-1002000: 60.7 0-1002002: 61.2 0-1002003: 61.9 0-1002004: 62.5 0-1002005: 60.7 0-1002006: 61.5 0-1002007: 62.2 0-1002008: 60.7 0-1002009: 60.2 0-1002010: 60.8 0-1002011: 60.4 0-1002012: 57.7 0-1002013: 58.4 0-1002014: 60 0-1002015: 59.9 0-1002016: 60.5 0-1002017: 60.3 0-1002018: 59.7 0-1002019: 59.6 0-1002020: 60 0-1002021: 59.4 0-1002022: 59.2 0-1002023: 59.7 0-1002024: 59.1 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2024, voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia stood at 59.07 0-100.

That represents a change of down 1.1% on the previous year and down 1.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia peaked at 64.65 0-100 in 1998 and was at its lowest, 57.68 0-100, in 2012.

Mongolia ranks 93rd of 207 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Mongolia, 1996 to 2024.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 63.14 0-100
1998 64.65 0-100 +2.4%
2000 60.75 0-100 -6.0%
2002 61.17 0-100 +0.7%
2003 61.93 0-100 +1.3%
2004 62.51 0-100 +0.9%
2005 60.72 0-100 -2.9%
2006 61.5 0-100 +1.3%
2007 62.23 0-100 +1.2%
2008 60.66 0-100 -2.5%
2009 60.24 0-100 -0.7%
2010 60.81 0-100 +0.9%
2011 60.43 0-100 -0.6%
2012 57.68 0-100 -4.6%
2013 58.36 0-100 +1.2%
2014 59.99 0-100 +2.8%
2015 59.9 0-100 -0.2%
2016 60.52 0-100 +1.0%
2017 60.3 0-100 -0.4%
2018 59.74 0-100 -0.9%
2019 59.62 0-100 -0.2%
2020 60.03 0-100 +0.7%
2021 59.44 0-100 -1.0%
2022 59.24 0-100 -0.3%
2023 59.7 0-100 +0.8%
2024 59.07 0-100 -1.1%

Mongolia compared with similar countries

  • Mongolia's 59.07 0-100 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 55.01 0-100, 1.1× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Mongolia's 59.07 0-100 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62.78 0-100, 94% of the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 63.9 0-100 63.14 0-100 64.65 0-100 2
2000s 61.3 0-100 60.24 0-100 62.51 0-100 9
2010s 59.73 0-100 57.68 0-100 60.81 0-100 10
2020s 59.5 0-100 59.07 0-100 60.03 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 90 Sao Tome and Principe 59.73 0-100 compare
  2. 91 Kosovo 59.64 0-100 compare
  3. 91 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 59.64 0-100 compare
  4. 94 Armenia 58.95 0-100 compare
  5. 95 Belize 58.67 0-100 compare
  6. 96 North Macedonia 58.14 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 207 places →

More reference data data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Mongolia was 59.07 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 64.65 0-100 in 1998.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 57.68 0-100 in 2012.
How does Mongolia rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Mongolia ranks 93rd out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/mongolia/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).