Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Bhutan

Bhutan: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 61.6 0-100 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
61.6 0-100
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
91st
of 208 countries
All-time high
62.22 0-100
in 2019
All-time low
35.34 0-100
in 1996
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bhutan, 1996–2025

02040601996201020251996: 35.3 0-1001998: 35.5 0-1002000: 36.5 0-1002002: 35.6 0-1002003: 36.1 0-1002004: 39.2 0-1002005: 45 0-1002006: 43.6 0-1002007: 47 0-1002008: 52.6 0-1002009: 53.9 0-1002010: 54.1 0-1002011: 53.9 0-1002012: 57.4 0-1002013: 59 0-1002014: 59.7 0-1002015: 60 0-1002016: 59.9 0-1002017: 59.9 0-1002018: 61.9 0-1002019: 62.2 0-1002020: 61 0-1002021: 61.1 0-1002022: 59.8 0-1002023: 59.9 0-1002024: 61.6 0-1002025: 61.6 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

Bhutan recorded 61.6 0-100 for voice and accountability - governance score in 2025.

That represents a change of up 2.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Bhutan peaked at 62.22 0-100 in 2019 and was at its lowest, 35.34 0-100, in 1996.

That places Bhutan 91st out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Bhutan, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Bhutan, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 35.34 0-100 —
1998 35.51 0-100 +0.5%
2000 36.52 0-100 +2.8%
2002 35.55 0-100 -2.7%
2003 36.09 0-100 +1.5%
2004 39.25 0-100 +8.7%
2005 45.04 0-100 +14.7%
2006 43.57 0-100 -3.3%
2007 46.96 0-100 +7.8%
2008 52.57 0-100 +11.9%
2009 53.88 0-100 +2.5%
2010 54.15 0-100 +0.5%
2011 53.94 0-100 -0.4%
2012 57.45 0-100 +6.5%
2013 59.01 0-100 +2.7%
2014 59.66 0-100 +1.1%
2015 59.96 0-100 +0.5%
2016 59.9 0-100 -0.1%
2017 59.89 0-100 -0.0%
2018 61.93 0-100 +3.4%
2019 62.22 0-100 +0.5%
2020 61.02 0-100 -1.9%
2021 61.09 0-100 +0.1%
2022 59.81 0-100 -2.1%
2023 59.89 0-100 +0.1%
2024 61.6 0-100 +2.9%
2025 61.6 0-100 +0.0%

Bhutan compared with similar countries

  • Bhutan's 61.6 0-100 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 44.49 0-100, 1.4× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Bhutan's 61.6 0-100 is above the median for South Asia, which is 54.78 0-100, 1.1× the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 35.43 0-100 35.34 0-100 35.51 0-100 2
2000s 43.27 0-100 35.55 0-100 53.88 0-100 9
2010s 58.81 0-100 53.94 0-100 62.22 0-100 10
2020s 60.83 0-100 59.81 0-100 61.6 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Bhutan

  1. 88 Suriname 62.09 0-100 compare
  2. 89 Mongolia 62.04 0-100 compare
  3. 90 Fiji 61.68 0-100 compare
  4. 92 Belize 61.56 0-100 compare
  5. 93 Sao Tome and Principe 61.3 0-100 compare
  6. 94 North Macedonia 61.28 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Bhutan

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Bhutan?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Bhutan was 61.6 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Bhutan?
The highest recorded value was 62.22 0-100 in 2019.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Bhutan?
The lowest recorded value was 35.34 0-100 in 1996.
How does Bhutan rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Bhutan ranks 91st out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Bhutan?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bhutan. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/bhutan/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bhutan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).