Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bhutan

Bhutan: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 63.87 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
63.87 0-100
Change on year
up 2.6%
World rank
71st
of 207 countries
All-time high
64.38 0-100
in 2019
All-time low
40.44 0-100
in 2002
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bhutan, 1996–2024

02040601996201020241996: 41.1 0-1001998: 41.2 0-1002000: 42 0-1002002: 40.4 0-1002003: 40.9 0-1002004: 42 0-1002005: 47.7 0-1002006: 46 0-1002007: 49 0-1002008: 53.5 0-1002009: 54.1 0-1002010: 54.2 0-1002011: 54 0-1002012: 58.5 0-1002013: 60.3 0-1002014: 60.4 0-1002015: 60.7 0-1002016: 60.6 0-1002017: 60.7 0-1002018: 64 0-1002019: 64.4 0-1002020: 62.8 0-1002021: 62.8 0-1002022: 61.5 0-1002023: 62.2 0-1002024: 63.9 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

Bhutan recorded 63.87 0-100 for voice and accountability - governance score in 2024.

That represents a change of up 2.6% on the previous year and up 5.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Bhutan peaked at 64.38 0-100 in 2019 and was at its lowest, 40.44 0-100, in 2002.

That places Bhutan 71st out of 207 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bhutan, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Bhutan, 1996 to 2024.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 41.06 0-100
1998 41.24 0-100 +0.4%
2000 41.97 0-100 +1.8%
2002 40.44 0-100 -3.6%
2003 40.88 0-100 +1.1%
2004 41.98 0-100 +2.7%
2005 47.66 0-100 +13.5%
2006 46.03 0-100 -3.4%
2007 48.99 0-100 +6.5%
2008 53.53 0-100 +9.3%
2009 54.12 0-100 +1.1%
2010 54.24 0-100 +0.2%
2011 54 0-100 -0.4%
2012 58.53 0-100 +8.4%
2013 60.27 0-100 +3.0%
2014 60.44 0-100 +0.3%
2015 60.71 0-100 +0.5%
2016 60.63 0-100 -0.1%
2017 60.67 0-100 +0.1%
2018 64.01 0-100 +5.5%
2019 64.38 0-100 +0.6%
2020 62.75 0-100 -2.5%
2021 62.84 0-100 +0.1%
2022 61.51 0-100 -2.1%
2023 62.25 0-100 +1.2%
2024 63.87 0-100 +2.6%

Bhutan compared with similar countries

  • Bhutan's 63.87 0-100 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 43.32 0-100, 1.5× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Bhutan's 63.87 0-100 is above the median for South Asia, which is 55.06 0-100, 1.2× the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 41.15 0-100 41.06 0-100 41.24 0-100 2
2000s 46.18 0-100 40.44 0-100 54.12 0-100 9
2010s 59.79 0-100 54 0-100 64.38 0-100 10
2020s 62.64 0-100 61.51 0-100 63.87 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Bhutan

  1. 68 Saint Kitts and Nevis 64.9 0-100 compare
  2. 69 Panama 64.57 0-100 compare
  3. 70 Trinidad and Tobago 63.96 0-100 compare
  4. 72 Montenegro 63.69 0-100 compare
  5. 73 Romania 63.63 0-100 compare
  6. 74 Argentina 63.6 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 207 places →

More reference data data for Bhutan

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Bhutan?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Bhutan was 63.87 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Bhutan?
The highest recorded value was 64.38 0-100 in 2019.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Bhutan?
The lowest recorded value was 40.44 0-100 in 2002.
How does Bhutan rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Bhutan ranks 71st out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Bhutan?
Over the last ten years it is up 5.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bhutan. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/bhutan/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bhutan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).