Bhutan vs Mongolia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Bhutan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 62.04 0-100 against 61.6 0-100 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.44 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mongolia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 91st and Mongolia ranks 89th of 208 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.43 0-100 | 66.02 0-100 | 30.6 0-100 | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 43.27 0-100 | 63.38 0-100 | 20.11 0-100 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 58.81 0-100 | 62.41 0-100 | 3.6 0-100 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 60.83 0-100 | 62.06 0-100 | 1.23 0-100 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Bhutan or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 62.04 0-100 against 61.6 0-100 in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Bhutan and Mongolia?
- 0.44 0-100, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Mongolia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Mongolia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Bhutan ranks 91st and Mongolia ranks 89th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).