Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Mauritius

Mauritius: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 68.84 0-100 in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
68.84 0-100
Change on year
up 1.7%
World rank
65th
of 208 countries
All-time high
75.81 0-100
in 2007
All-time low
64.86 0-100
in 2023
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mauritius, 1996–2025

0204060801996201020251996: 71.3 0-1001998: 72.9 0-1002000: 73.1 0-1002002: 71.3 0-1002003: 73.3 0-1002004: 73.4 0-1002005: 74.5 0-1002006: 75.5 0-1002007: 75.8 0-1002008: 74.7 0-1002009: 74.1 0-1002010: 71.1 0-1002011: 71 0-1002012: 73.4 0-1002013: 73.5 0-1002014: 73.8 0-1002015: 72.1 0-1002016: 72.4 0-1002017: 72 0-1002018: 72.1 0-1002019: 68.6 0-1002020: 67.6 0-1002021: 65.8 0-1002022: 65.4 0-1002023: 64.9 0-1002024: 67.7 0-1002025: 68.8 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance score in Mauritius stood at 68.84 0-100.

The figure is up 1.7% on the previous year and down 4.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Mauritius peaked at 75.81 0-100 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 64.86 0-100, in 2023.

Mauritius ranks 65th of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Mauritius, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Mauritius, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 71.34 0-100 —
1998 72.9 0-100 +2.2%
2000 73.1 0-100 +0.3%
2002 71.32 0-100 -2.4%
2003 73.26 0-100 +2.7%
2004 73.4 0-100 +0.2%
2005 74.5 0-100 +1.5%
2006 75.53 0-100 +1.4%
2007 75.81 0-100 +0.4%
2008 74.72 0-100 -1.4%
2009 74.14 0-100 -0.8%
2010 71.11 0-100 -4.1%
2011 70.95 0-100 -0.2%
2012 73.36 0-100 +3.4%
2013 73.48 0-100 +0.2%
2014 73.77 0-100 +0.4%
2015 72.08 0-100 -2.3%
2016 72.44 0-100 +0.5%
2017 72.03 0-100 -0.6%
2018 72.14 0-100 +0.2%
2019 68.59 0-100 -4.9%
2020 67.57 0-100 -1.5%
2021 65.84 0-100 -2.6%
2022 65.35 0-100 -0.7%
2023 64.86 0-100 -0.8%
2024 67.7 0-100 +4.4%
2025 68.84 0-100 +1.7%

Mauritius compared with similar countries

  • Mauritius's 68.84 0-100 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 56.73 0-100, 1.2× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Mauritius's 68.84 0-100 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 41.18 0-100, 1.7× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 72.12 0-100 71.34 0-100 72.9 0-100 2
2000s 73.98 0-100 71.32 0-100 75.81 0-100 9
2010s 71.99 0-100 68.59 0-100 73.77 0-100 10
2020s 66.69 0-100 64.86 0-100 68.84 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Mauritius

  1. 62 Bahamas 69.32 0-100 compare
  2. 63 Solomon Islands 69.14 0-100 compare
  3. 64 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 68.98 0-100 compare
  4. 66 Jamaica 68.64 0-100 compare
  5. 67 Saint Kitts and Nevis 68.34 0-100 compare
  6. 68 Antigua and Barbuda 67.81 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Mauritius

All data for Mauritius →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Mauritius?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Mauritius was 68.84 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Mauritius?
The highest recorded value was 75.81 0-100 in 2007.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Mauritius?
The lowest recorded value was 64.86 0-100 in 2023.
How does Mauritius rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Mauritius ranks 65th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Mauritius?
Over the last ten years it is down 4.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Mauritius data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mauritius. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/mauritius/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Mauritius</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).