Mauritius vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Mauritius
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 68.84 0-100 against 68.34 0-100 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.5 0-100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Mauritius ranks 65th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 67th of 208 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.12 0-100 | 76.22 0-100 | 4.11 0-100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2000s | 73.98 0-100 | 76.16 0-100 | 2.18 0-100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 71.99 0-100 | 74.32 0-100 | 2.32 0-100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 66.69 0-100 | 68.11 0-100 | 1.42 0-100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Mauritius or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Mauritius, at 68.84 0-100 against 68.34 0-100 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.5 0-100, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Mauritius ranks 65th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 67th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).