Mauritius vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)

Mauritius
68.84 0-100
in 2025
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
68.98 0-100
in 2025
Mauritius rank
65th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
64th

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
020406080199620102025

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 68.98 0-100 against 68.84 0-100 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.14 0-100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Mauritius ranks 65th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 64th of 208 countries.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1990s 72.12 0-100 76.55 0-100 4.44 0-100 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2000s 73.98 0-100 76.28 0-100 2.3 0-100 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2010s 71.99 0-100 73.15 0-100 1.15 0-100 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 66.69 0-100 70.16 0-100 3.46 0-100 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Mauritius or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 68.98 0-100 against 68.84 0-100 in Mauritius as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Mauritius and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
0.14 0-100, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
Mauritius ranks 65th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 64th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/mauritius/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/mauritius/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Mauritius vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).