Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Liechtenstein

Liechtenstein: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 82.28 0-100 in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
82.28 0-100
Change on year
down 0.1%
World rank
18th
of 208 countries
All-time high
88.06 0-100
in 2009
All-time low
80.41 0-100
in 2004
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Liechtenstein, 1996–2025

0204060801996201020251996: 85 0-1001998: 84.9 0-1002000: 85 0-1002002: 82 0-1002003: 82.1 0-1002004: 80.4 0-1002005: 83.9 0-1002006: 83.1 0-1002007: 84.3 0-1002008: 84.3 0-1002009: 88.1 0-1002010: 88 0-1002011: 87.2 0-1002012: 85.3 0-1002013: 85.3 0-1002014: 83.9 0-1002015: 83.9 0-1002016: 83.1 0-1002017: 82.8 0-1002018: 82.1 0-1002019: 82.2 0-1002020: 82.2 0-1002021: 82.5 0-1002022: 82.5 0-1002023: 82.2 0-1002024: 82.4 0-1002025: 82.3 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance score in Liechtenstein stood at 82.28 0-100.

The figure is down 0.1% on the previous year and down 1.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Liechtenstein peaked at 88.06 0-100 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 80.41 0-100, in 2004.

Liechtenstein ranks 18th of 208 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Liechtenstein, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Liechtenstein, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 84.97 0-100 —
1998 84.94 0-100 -0.0%
2000 84.97 0-100 +0.0%
2002 81.97 0-100 -3.5%
2003 82.08 0-100 +0.1%
2004 80.41 0-100 -2.0%
2005 83.85 0-100 +4.3%
2006 83.1 0-100 -0.9%
2007 84.26 0-100 +1.4%
2008 84.28 0-100 +0.0%
2009 88.06 0-100 +4.5%
2010 88.04 0-100 -0.0%
2011 87.23 0-100 -0.9%
2012 85.25 0-100 -2.3%
2013 85.27 0-100 +0.0%
2014 83.94 0-100 -1.6%
2015 83.89 0-100 -0.1%
2016 83.05 0-100 -1.0%
2017 82.77 0-100 -0.3%
2018 82.05 0-100 -0.9%
2019 82.16 0-100 +0.1%
2020 82.15 0-100 -0.0%
2021 82.51 0-100 +0.4%
2022 82.55 0-100 +0.0%
2023 82.18 0-100 -0.4%
2024 82.39 0-100 +0.3%
2025 82.28 0-100 -0.1%

Liechtenstein compared with similar countries

  • Liechtenstein's 82.28 0-100 is above the median for high income countries, which is 76.46 0-100, 1.1× the median. (76 countries reporting)
  • Liechtenstein's 82.28 0-100 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 73.89 0-100, 1.1× the median. (54 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 84.96 0-100 84.94 0-100 84.97 0-100 2
2000s 83.66 0-100 80.41 0-100 88.06 0-100 9
2010s 84.37 0-100 82.05 0-100 88.04 0-100 10
2020s 82.34 0-100 82.15 0-100 82.55 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Liechtenstein

  1. 15 Australia 83.75 0-100 compare
  2. 16 Iceland 82.74 0-100 compare
  3. 17 Estonia 82.38 0-100 compare
  4. 19 United Kingdom 81.29 0-100 compare
  5. 20 Portugal 81.06 0-100 compare
  6. 21 Tuvalu 80.81 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Liechtenstein

All data for Liechtenstein →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Liechtenstein?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Liechtenstein was 82.28 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Liechtenstein?
The highest recorded value was 88.06 0-100 in 2009.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Liechtenstein?
The lowest recorded value was 80.41 0-100 in 2004.
How does Liechtenstein rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Liechtenstein ranks 18th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Liechtenstein?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Liechtenstein data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Liechtenstein. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/liechtenstein/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Liechtenstein</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).