Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Tuvalu

Tuvalu: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 77.65 0-100 in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
77.65 0-100
Change on year
up 6.1%
World rank
25th
of 206 countries
All-time high
80.67 0-100
in 1996
All-time low
64.21 0-100
in 2013
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Tuvalu, 1996–2024

0204060801996201020241996: 80.7 0-1001998: 80.6 0-1002000: 80.6 0-1002002: 75.7 0-1002003: 73.4 0-1002004: 67.5 0-1002005: 69.4 0-1002006: 67.8 0-1002007: 66.6 0-1002008: 66.6 0-1002009: 66.6 0-1002010: 66.6 0-1002011: 66.6 0-1002012: 64.3 0-1002013: 64.2 0-1002014: 66 0-1002015: 66 0-1002016: 66 0-1002017: 66 0-1002018: 72.5 0-1002019: 76.8 0-1002020: 72.3 0-1002021: 73.2 0-1002022: 73.2 0-1002023: 73.2 0-1002024: 77.7 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance score in Tuvalu is 77.65 0-100, measured in 2024.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.1% on the previous year and up 17.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Tuvalu peaked at 80.67 0-100 in 1996 and was at its lowest, 64.21 0-100, in 2013.

Tuvalu ranks 25th of 206 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 80.65 0-100 80.63 0-100 80.67 0-100 2
2000s 70.46 0-100 66.58 0-100 80.65 0-100 9
2010s 67.51 0-100 64.21 0-100 76.85 0-100 10
2020s 73.91 0-100 72.31 0-100 77.65 0-100 5

Countries ranked near Tuvalu

  1. 22 San Marino 78.66 0-100 compare
  2. 23 Uruguay 78.34 0-100 compare
  3. 24 Lithuania 78.25 0-100 compare
  4. 26 Guam 77.43 0-100 compare
  5. 27 France 76.95 0-100 compare
  6. 28 Spain 76.95 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 206 places →

More reference data data for Tuvalu

All data for Tuvalu →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Tuvalu?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Tuvalu was 77.65 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Tuvalu?
The highest recorded value was 80.67 0-100 in 1996.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Tuvalu?
The lowest recorded value was 64.21 0-100 in 2013.
How does Tuvalu rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Tuvalu ranks 25th out of 206 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Tuvalu?
Over the last ten years it is up 17.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Tuvalu data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).