Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Australia

Australia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 83.75 0-100 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
83.75 0-100
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
15th
of 208 countries
All-time high
87.23 0-100
in 2012
All-time low
78.51 0-100
in 1998
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Australia, 1996–2025

0204060801996201020251996: 78.5 0-1001998: 78.5 0-1002000: 78.8 0-1002002: 79.3 0-1002003: 79.3 0-1002004: 83.1 0-1002005: 85.7 0-1002006: 85.5 0-1002007: 85.3 0-1002008: 85.3 0-1002009: 85.3 0-1002010: 85.9 0-1002011: 86.4 0-1002012: 87.2 0-1002013: 84.6 0-1002014: 84.5 0-1002015: 84.8 0-1002016: 85.4 0-1002017: 85.9 0-1002018: 84.9 0-1002019: 83.8 0-1002020: 83.3 0-1002021: 82.7 0-1002022: 83.5 0-1002023: 84 0-1002024: 83.7 0-1002025: 83.7 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance score in Australia stood at 83.75 0-100.

That represents a change of down 1.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Australia peaked at 87.23 0-100 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 78.51 0-100, in 1998.

That places Australia 15th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Australia, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Australia, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 78.52 0-100 —
1998 78.51 0-100 -0.0%
2000 78.76 0-100 +0.3%
2002 79.28 0-100 +0.7%
2003 79.3 0-100 +0.0%
2004 83.05 0-100 +4.7%
2005 85.69 0-100 +3.2%
2006 85.51 0-100 -0.2%
2007 85.31 0-100 -0.2%
2008 85.27 0-100 -0.0%
2009 85.34 0-100 +0.1%
2010 85.92 0-100 +0.7%
2011 86.42 0-100 +0.6%
2012 87.23 0-100 +0.9%
2013 84.6 0-100 -3.0%
2014 84.51 0-100 -0.1%
2015 84.84 0-100 +0.4%
2016 85.43 0-100 +0.7%
2017 85.92 0-100 +0.6%
2018 84.92 0-100 -1.2%
2019 83.78 0-100 -1.3%
2020 83.29 0-100 -0.6%
2021 82.67 0-100 -0.7%
2022 83.54 0-100 +1.0%
2023 84.01 0-100 +0.6%
2024 83.74 0-100 -0.3%
2025 83.75 0-100 +0.0%

Australia compared with similar countries

  • Australia's 83.75 0-100 is above the median for high income countries, which is 76.46 0-100, 1.1× the median. (76 countries reporting)
  • Australia's 83.75 0-100 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 63.85 0-100, 1.3× the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 78.51 0-100 78.51 0-100 78.52 0-100 2
2000s 83.06 0-100 78.76 0-100 85.69 0-100 9
2010s 85.36 0-100 83.78 0-100 87.23 0-100 10
2020s 83.5 0-100 82.67 0-100 84.01 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Australia

  1. 12 Belgium 83.91 0-100 compare
  2. 13 Greenland 83.79 0-100 compare
  3. 14 Austria 83.77 0-100 compare
  4. 16 Iceland 82.74 0-100 compare
  5. 17 Estonia 82.38 0-100 compare
  6. 18 Liechtenstein 82.28 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Australia

All data for Australia →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Australia?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Australia was 83.75 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Australia?
The highest recorded value was 87.23 0-100 in 2012.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Australia?
The lowest recorded value was 78.51 0-100 in 1998.
How does Australia rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Australia ranks 15th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Australia?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Australia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Australia. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/australia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/australia/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Australia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).