Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Hungary

Hungary: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 57.07 0-100 in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
57.07 0-100
Change on year
down 1.7%
World rank
107th
of 208 countries
All-time high
78.53 0-100
in 2005
All-time low
57.07 0-100
in 2025
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Hungary, 1996–2025

0204060801996201020251996: 74 0-1001998: 73.7 0-1002000: 75.7 0-1002002: 76.7 0-1002003: 77.5 0-1002004: 75.7 0-1002005: 78.5 0-1002006: 76.9 0-1002007: 76.5 0-1002008: 75.1 0-1002009: 75.1 0-1002010: 74.1 0-1002011: 73 0-1002012: 70.5 0-1002013: 69.7 0-1002014: 66.8 0-1002015: 66 0-1002016: 64.4 0-1002017: 63.9 0-1002018: 60.9 0-1002019: 61.1 0-1002020: 60.8 0-1002021: 60.2 0-1002022: 59.5 0-1002023: 58.4 0-1002024: 58 0-1002025: 57.1 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance score in Hungary stood at 57.07 0-100. That is the lowest value across all 27 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.7% on the previous year and down 13.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Hungary peaked at 78.53 0-100 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 57.07 0-100, in 2025.

That places Hungary 107th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Hungary, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Hungary, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 74.03 0-100 —
1998 73.7 0-100 -0.4%
2000 75.69 0-100 +2.7%
2002 76.71 0-100 +1.3%
2003 77.48 0-100 +1.0%
2004 75.67 0-100 -2.3%
2005 78.53 0-100 +3.8%
2006 76.9 0-100 -2.1%
2007 76.48 0-100 -0.5%
2008 75.05 0-100 -1.9%
2009 75.11 0-100 +0.1%
2010 74.15 0-100 -1.3%
2011 72.98 0-100 -1.6%
2012 70.47 0-100 -3.4%
2013 69.7 0-100 -1.1%
2014 66.83 0-100 -4.1%
2015 66 0-100 -1.2%
2016 64.39 0-100 -2.4%
2017 63.89 0-100 -0.8%
2018 60.85 0-100 -4.8%
2019 61.14 0-100 +0.5%
2020 60.77 0-100 -0.6%
2021 60.18 0-100 -1.0%
2022 59.46 0-100 -1.2%
2023 58.41 0-100 -1.8%
2024 58.03 0-100 -0.6%
2025 57.07 0-100 -1.7%

Hungary compared with similar countries

  • Hungary's 57.07 0-100 is below the median for high income countries, which is 76.46 0-100, 75% of the median. (76 countries reporting)
  • Hungary's 57.07 0-100 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 73.89 0-100, 77% of the median. (54 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 73.86 0-100 73.7 0-100 74.03 0-100 2
2000s 76.4 0-100 75.05 0-100 78.53 0-100 9
2010s 67.04 0-100 60.85 0-100 74.15 0-100 10
2020s 58.98 0-100 57.07 0-100 60.77 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Hungary

  1. 104 Liberia 58.04 0-100 compare
  2. 105 Sri Lanka 57.86 0-100 compare
  3. 106 Malawi 57.56 0-100 compare
  4. 108 Peru 56.73 0-100 compare
  5. 109 Ecuador 56.25 0-100 compare
  6. 110 Ukraine 56.19 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Hungary

All data for Hungary →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Hungary?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Hungary was 57.07 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Hungary?
The highest recorded value was 78.53 0-100 in 2005.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Hungary?
The lowest recorded value was 57.07 0-100 in 2025.
How does Hungary rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Hungary ranks 107th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Hungary?
Over the last ten years it is down 13.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Hungary data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Hungary. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/hungary/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Hungary</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).